Comparisons 21-05-2022 Comprehensive testing data of HiSilicon Kirin 9000L vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications of the CPUs, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as Geekbench, PassMark, 3DMark, Vellamo, PCMark, Neocore, AnTuTu, GFXBench, Quadrant, and how good the CPUs are in games Call of Duty, GTA, Fortnite, Madout2, Minecraft, Asphalt 9, PUBG etc. After reading the results these tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy Kirin 9000L or Snapdragon 780G.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreKirin 9000L | 87% |
Snapdragon 780G | 97% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Kirin 9000L | 94% |
Snapdragon 780G | 99% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingKirin 9000L | 84% |
Snapdragon 780G | 90% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Kirin 9000L |
Snapdragon 780G | Total score | 644858 | 718020 | CPU | 216046 | 91177 | GPU | 227655 | 113501 | MEM | 126580 | 52158 | UX | 107532 | 47521 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Kirin 9000L |
Snapdragon 780G | Single-Core | 1018 | 1608 | Multi-Core | 3529 | 5467 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Kirin 9000L |
Snapdragon 780G | Frequency | 2860 MHz | 2400 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 1x2.86 GHz ARM Cortex-A77 3x2.06 GHz ARM Cortex-A77 4x1.86 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 6 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR5, LPDDR4x | LPDDR5 | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1600 | 4666 | Memory bandwidth | 44 | 17 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | | 512 KB | L2 cache | | 1 MB | L3 cache | | 2 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.3-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 9000L is 16% better than Snapdragon 780G in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G78 MP14 | Adreno 640 | GPU Frequency | 700 MHz | 750 MHz | GFloPS | 976 | 986 | # of Cores | 24 | | # of Shader Units | | 384 | Display | 2560 x 1600 pixels | 3360 x 1600 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | | Real Racing 3 | | | Sniper 3D | | | Need for Speed No Limits | | | Mortal Kombat X | | | CSR Racing 2 | | | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 128 MP | 192 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 48 MP | 64 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Qualcomm Spectra 570 | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 60 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | Balong 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon X55 Modem-RF System 5G | Download speed | 15000 MBit/s. | 7000 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 14000 MBit/s. | 3500 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou, QZSS, SBAS | NFC support | Yes | Yes | 5G support | No | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 9000L is better: 10
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G is better: 16 Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips, and also read the test results on the links under the article. • Devices lists • Benchmarks • PUBG mobile • Fortnite Mobile • Antutu 8 • 3DMark • GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle • Vs Apple M1 • Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Devices lists • Benchmarks • PUBG mobile • Fortnite Mobile • Antutu 8 • 3DMark • GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle • Vs Apple M1 • Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • MediaTek Dimensity 1300 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
|