MediaTek MT6739WM vs HiSilicon Kirin 620

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive comparison data of benchmarks MediaTek MT6739WM vs HiSilicon Kirin 620, speed testing of GPUs Mali-450 MP4 and PowerVR GE8100.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: MT6739WM is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Kirin 620 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful review of all the technical characteristics of the CPUs, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special test applications like Mozilla Kraken, Neocore, Quadrant, 3DMark, PCMark, PassMark, AnTuTu, GFXBench, Geekbench, WebXPRT 3, Octane V2, Vellamo, and how good the SoCs are in games Minecraft Bedrock, Mortal Kombat, Fortnite, Call of Duty: Mobile, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, PUBG, Real Racing 3, Sniper 3D etc.
   After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processors is better to buy MT6739WM or Kirin 620 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Asphalt 9.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT6739WM

Kirin 620

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT6739WM

30%

Kirin 620

24%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT6739WM

Kirin 620

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT6739WM	Kirin 620
Total score	34420	33885
CPU	9642	9480
GPU	13080	12867
MEM	5508	5430
UX	6201	6089

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT6739WM	Kirin 620
Single-Core	91	90
Multi-Core	420	414

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT6739WM	Kirin 620
Frequency	1100 MHz	1200 MHz
Cores	4	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	8x1.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR3	LPDDR3x
Max. Memory	3 Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	667	800
Memory bandwidth	4	28
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	64 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	4 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 620 is 8% better than MT6739WM in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that MT6739WM has 4 more core than Kirin 620. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	PowerVR GE8100	Mali-450 MP4
GPU Frequency	570 MHz	500 MHz
GFloPS	11.2	29.81
# of Cores	1	4
# of Shader Units
Display	1440 x 720 pixels	1920 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	10.1	11.9
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	27.1	28.4
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	18.4	19.1
Call of Duty: Mobile	15.5	17.4
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	23.4	23.5
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	35.1	35.4
Real Racing 3	27.6	38.2
Sniper 3D	23.9	24.8
Need for Speed No Limits	29.4	22.9
Mortal Kombat X	21.2	24.8
CSR Racing 2	23.9	24.8

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	13 MP	13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Download speed	150 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6739WM is better: 10
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 620 is better: 24
You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors MT6739WM and Kirin 620, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MT6739WM SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark

• MT6739WM specs and review.

Kirin 620 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Kirin 620 specs and review.