MediaTek MT6735P vs HiSilicon Kirin 620

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which chip or processor is better? Detailed comparison data of benchmarks MediaTek MT6735P vs HiSilicon Kirin 620, speed examination of GPUs Mali-T720 MP2 and Mali-450 MP4.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: MT6735P is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Kirin 620 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests like Neocore, Vellamo, Mozilla Kraken, PassMark, AnTuTu 8, GeekBench 6, 5, Quadrant, GFXBench, Octane V2, PCMark, WebXPRT 3, 3DMark, and how good the CPUs are in games PUBG, Mortal Kombat, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, Call of Duty: Mobile, Minecraft Bedrock, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Fortnite etc.
   After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which chipset is better to buy MT6735P or Kirin 620 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, CSR Racing 2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT6735P

Kirin 620

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT6735P

24%

Kirin 620

24%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT6735P

Kirin 620

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT6735P	Kirin 620
Total score	25064	33885
CPU	7020	9480
GPU	9527	12867
MEM	4009	5430
UX	4510	6089

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT6735P	Kirin 620
Single-Core	66	90
Multi-Core	306	414

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT6735P	Kirin 620
Frequency	1000 MHz	1200 MHz
Cores	4	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	8x1.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR3 (Single Channel)	LPDDR3x
Max. Memory	4 Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	667	800
Memory bandwidth	4	28
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	64 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	4 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 620 is 16% better than MT6735P in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that MT6735P has 4 more core than Kirin 620. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-T720 MP2	Mali-450 MP4
GPU Frequency	400 MHz	500 MHz
GFloPS	13.6	29.81
# of Cores	2	4
# of Shader Units
Display	1280 x 720 pixels	1920 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	6.9	11.9
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	19.2	28.4
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	11.9	19.1
Call of Duty: Mobile	11.6	17.4
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	15.7	23.5
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	24.3	35.4
Real Racing 3	14.9	38.2
Sniper 3D	26.2	24.8
Need for Speed No Limits	16.7	22.9
Mortal Kombat X	13.7	24.8
CSR Racing 2	15.5	24.8

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	13 MP	13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Download speed	150 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6735P is better: 2
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 620 is better: 31
You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips MT6735P and Kirin 620, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MT6735P SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MT6735P specs and review.

Kirin 620 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Kirin 620 specs and review.