 |
AMD EPYC 9554P vs AMD EPYC 7543P |
|
Processor comparisons 11-03-2023 If you have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests AMD EPYC 9554P vs AMD EPYC 7543P and see which is better for games or normal use for rendering, programming, machine learning, streaming, video editing. Here is useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or different benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like Dolphin Emulator, DaVinci Resolve Studio, PassMark, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, PCMark 10, RealBench, Handbrake, Blender, UserBenchmark, Prime95, 7zip, WPrime, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), MATLAB, Gears 5, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Furmark, VeraCrypt, AIDA64, SuperPi. And how good the processors are in games: - Rainbow Six Siege
- Watch Dogs Legion
- DOOM: Eternal
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Borderlands 3
- Valorant
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fortnite
- Overwatch
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Fallout 76
- Valheim
- Halo Infinite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Apex Legends
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Death Stranding
- Last Man Standing
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7543P or AMD EPYC 9554P.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
EPYC 9554P | 87% |
EPYC 7543P | 68% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9554P is 21% better than EPYC 7543P. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 9554P | 88% |
EPYC 7543P | 67% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Ghostrunner, Control, Forza Horizon 4, Hitman 3, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Battlefield V, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, NBA 2K20, League of Legends (LOL), Half-Life: Alyx, Monster Hunter World, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, DOTA 2A, Metro Exodus, Horizon Zero Dawn.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 155.1 | 119.6 | Valorant | 176.3 | 136.0 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 98.7 | 76.1 | Apex Legends | 165.7 | 127.8 | Call of Duty Warzone | 132.2 | 102.0 | Overwatch | 142.8 | 110.1 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 121.6 | 93.8 | DOOM Eternal | 88.1 | 68.0 | Warzone | 137.5 | 106.0 | Assassin's Creed | 148.1 | 114.2 | Valheim | 146.3 | 112.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 9554P | 14% |
EPYC 7543P | 19% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7543P is more energy efficient than the EPYC 9554P as it consumes less power: 360W vs. 225W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video rendering or video editing, streaming, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 9554P |
AMD EPYC 7543P | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 372 | 182 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 15207 | 7497 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 697 | 341 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 32229 | 15890 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1705 | 840 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 83804 | 41322 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9554P |
AMD EPYC 7543P | Single-Core | 3590 | 1769 | Multi-Core | 122932 | 60614 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9554P |
AMD EPYC 7543P | Single-Core | 1540 | 1306 | Multi-Core | 65817 | 31025 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 9554P |
AMD EPYC 7543P | Announcement date | November 10, 2022 | March 15, 2021 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | SP5 | SP3 | Core name | Genoa | Milan | Architecture | Zen 4 | Zen 3 | Generation | 4 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 3.75 MHz | 3.7 MHz | Frequency | 3.1 MHz | 2.8 MHz | Cores | 64 | 32 | Threads | 128 | 64 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 108000 millions | 68000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 360 W | 225 W | Memory type | DDR5 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 460.8 | 204.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 256MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | 100-000000804 100-100000804WOF | 100-000000341 100-100000341WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9554P is 9% better than EPYC 7543P in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9554P has 32 more core than EPYC 7543P. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9554P is better: 32
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7543P is better: 1 However, it should be realized that all the data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of real owners of AMD EPYC 9554P and AMD EPYC 7543P before making a decision which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 9554P Processor Comparisons • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7543P Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|