 |
AMD EPYC 9554P vs AMD EPYC 9654P |
|
Processor comparisons 11-03-2023
Let's say there are difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests AMD EPYC 9554P vs AMD EPYC 9654P and decide which is better for games or simple use for rendering, programming, streaming, machine learning, video editing. Here you can find all information from various benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as Furmark, AIDA64, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Dolphin Emulator, RealBench, Prime95, UserBenchmark, 7zip, PassMark, Handbrake, 3DMark, WPrime, VeraCrypt, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, Gears 5, SuperPi, MATLAB, Blender, PCMark 10, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15).
And how good the processors are in games: - Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Last Man Standing
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valheim
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Rainbow Six Siege
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valorant
- Borderlands 3
- Apex Legends
- Death Stranding
- Overwatch
- Fallout 76
- Halo Infinite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fortnite
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9654P or AMD EPYC 9554P.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 9554P | 87% |
EPYC 9654P | 98% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9654P is 11% better than EPYC 9554P. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 9554P | 88% |
EPYC 9654P | 98% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Metro Exodus, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, Forza Horizon 4, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Horizon Zero Dawn, Monster Hunter World, Control, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Hitman 3, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), DOTA 2A, Ghostrunner, NBA 2K20, League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 155.1 | 173.9 | | Valorant | 176.3 | 197.6 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 98.7 | 110.7 | | Apex Legends | 165.7 | 185.8 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 132.2 | 148.2 | | Overwatch | 142.8 | 160.1 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 121.6 | 136.4 | | DOOM Eternal | 88.1 | 98.8 | | Warzone | 137.5 | 154.1 | | Assassin's Creed | 148.1 | 166.0 | | Valheim | 146.3 | 164.0 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 9554P | 14% |
EPYC 9654P | 14% |
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, machine learning, streaming, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 9554P |
AMD EPYC 9654P | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 372 | 469 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 15207 | 19565 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 697 | 887 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 32229 | 41479 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1705 | 2185 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 83804 | 107871 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9554P |
AMD EPYC 9654P | | Single-Core | 3590 | 4612 | | Multi-Core | 122932 | 158238 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9554P |
AMD EPYC 9654P | | Single-Core | 1540 | 1586 | | Multi-Core | 65817 | 84216 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 9554P |
AMD EPYC 9654P | | Announcement date | November 10, 2022 | November 10, 2022 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP5 | SP5 | | Core name | Genoa | Genoa | | Architecture | Zen 4 | Zen 4 | | Generation | 4 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.75 MHz | 3.7 MHz | | Frequency | 3.1 MHz | 2.4 MHz | | Cores | 64 | 96 | | Threads | 128 | 192 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 108000 millions | 116000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 360 W | 360 W | | Memory type | DDR5 | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | | | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 460.8 | 460.8 | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 384MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | | Part number | 100-000000804
100-100000804WOF | 100-000000803
100-100000803WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9554P is 22% better than EPYC 9654P in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9654P has 32 more core than EPYC 9554P. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9554P is better: 2
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9654P is better: 25
However, it should be realized that all the figures in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD EPYC 9554P and AMD EPYC 9654P before making a selection which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 9554P Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9654P Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
