 |
AMD EPYC 9474F vs AMD EPYC 9554P |
|
Processor comparisons 15-03-2023
If there are difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests AMD EPYC 9474F vs AMD EPYC 9554P and understand which is better for games or simple use for rendering, video editing, machine learning, streaming, programming. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or several benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like Blender, Furmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, GeekBench 6, 5.2, VeraCrypt, UserBenchmark, WPrime, Prime95, Dolphin Emulator, MATLAB, RealBench, 7zip, Blender, SuperPi, Handbrake, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PCMark 10, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 3DMark, Gears 5, PassMark, AIDA64.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - Fallout 76
- Apex Legends
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Borderlands 3
- Halo Infinite
- Death Stranding
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fortnite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valheim
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Last Man Standing
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Valorant
- Overwatch
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- DOOM: Eternal
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9554P or AMD EPYC 9474F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 9474F | 77% |
EPYC 9554P | 87% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9554P is 11% better than EPYC 9474F. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 9474F | 85% |
EPYC 9554P | 88% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Battlefield V, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter World, League of Legends (LOL), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Control, Forza Horizon 4, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Metro Exodus, Ghostrunner, DOTA 2A, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Half-Life: Alyx, Horizon Zero Dawn, Hitman 3, NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 150.1 | 155.1 | | Valorant | 170.6 | 176.3 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 95.5 | 98.7 | | Apex Legends | 160.3 | 165.7 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 127.9 | 132.2 | | Overwatch | 138.1 | 142.8 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 117.7 | 121.6 | | DOOM Eternal | 85.3 | 88.1 | | Warzone | 133.0 | 137.5 | | Assassin's Creed | 143.3 | 148.1 | | Valheim | 141.6 | 146.3 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 9474F | 16% |
EPYC 9554P | 14% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 9474F is more energy efficient than the EPYC 9554P since it has less power consumption: 360W vs. 360W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, video rendering or video editing, programming, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 9474F |
AMD EPYC 9554P | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 246 | 372 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 11139 | 15207 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 484 | 697 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 23633 | 32229 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1229 | 1705 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 61496 | 83804 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9474F |
AMD EPYC 9554P | | Single-Core | 2790 | 3590 | | Multi-Core | 90217 | 122932 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9474F |
AMD EPYC 9554P | | Single-Core | 1762 | 1540 | | Multi-Core | 60869 | 65817 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 9474F |
AMD EPYC 9554P | | Announcement date | November 10, 2022 | November 10, 2022 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP5 | SP5 | | Core name | Genoa | Genoa | | Architecture | Zen 4 | Zen 4 | | Generation | 4 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.1 MHz | 3.75 MHz | | Frequency | 3.6 MHz | 3.1 MHz | | Cores | 48 | 64 | | Threads | 96 | 128 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 64000 millions | 108000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 360 W | 360 W | | Memory type | DDR5 | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s | 460.8 | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | | Part number | 100-000000788
100-000000788WOF | 100-000000804
100-100000804WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9474F is 13% better than EPYC 9554P in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9554P has 16 more core than EPYC 9474F. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9474F is better: 5
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9554P is better: 23
Although it should be understood that all the data in the article above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD EPYC 9474F and AMD EPYC 9554P before making a decision which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 9474F Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9554P Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
