|
AMD EPYC 7773X vs AMD EPYC 7543P |
|
Processor comparisons 20-04-2023 Let's say you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a choice after reading the detailed tests AMD EPYC 7773X vs AMD EPYC 7543P and understand which is better for games or normal use for video editing, machine learning, programming, streaming, rendering. Here you can find all information from real video editing and streaming tests or several benchmarks. A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications such as UserBenchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, 7zip, VeraCrypt, SuperPi, Blender, WPrime, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Handbrake, AIDA64, PCMark 10, Prime95, Furmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Dolphin Emulator, 3DMark, Blender, RealBench, MATLAB, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PassMark, Gears 5. And how good the processors are in games: - World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Apex Legends
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Watch Dogs Legion
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fortnite
- Valheim
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fallout 76
- Death Stranding
- Halo Infinite
- Overwatch
- Borderlands 3
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valorant
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Last Man Standing
- Rainbow Six Siege
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7543P or AMD EPYC 7773X.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
EPYC 7773X | 74% |
EPYC 7543P | 68% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7773X is 8% better than EPYC 7543P. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 7773X | 80% |
EPYC 7543P | 67% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Half-Life: Alyx, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Forza Horizon 4, NBA 2K20, Horizon Zero Dawn, Battlefield V, Ghostrunner, Monster Hunter World, Metro Exodus, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Hitman 3, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Control, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, League of Legends (LOL), DOTA 2A.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 142.2 | 119.6 | Valorant | 161.6 | 136.0 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 90.5 | 76.1 | Apex Legends | 151.9 | 127.8 | Call of Duty Warzone | 121.2 | 102.0 | Overwatch | 130.9 | 110.1 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 111.5 | 93.8 | DOOM Eternal | 80.8 | 68.0 | Warzone | 126.0 | 106.0 | Assassin's Creed | 135.7 | 114.2 | Valheim | 134.1 | 112.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 7773X | 16% |
EPYC 7543P | 19% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7543P is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7773X since it has less power consumption: 280W vs. 225W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, streaming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7773X |
AMD EPYC 7543P | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 248 | 182 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 9889 | 7497 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 481 | 341 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 24485 | 15890 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1115 | 840 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 54474 | 41322 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7773X |
AMD EPYC 7543P | Single-Core | 2797 | 1769 | Multi-Core | 79901 | 60614 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7773X |
AMD EPYC 7543P | Single-Core | 1385 | 1306 | Multi-Core | 53124 | 31025 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 7773X |
AMD EPYC 7543P | Announcement date | March 22, 2022 | March 15, 2021 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | SP3 | SP3 | Core name | Milan | Milan | Architecture | Zen 3 | Zen 3 | Generation | 3 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 3.5 MHz | 3.7 MHz | Frequency | 2.2 MHz | 2.8 MHz | Cores | 64 | 32 | Threads | 128 | 64 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 86000 millions | 68000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 280 W | 225 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 768MB | 256MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | 100-000000504 100-000000504​WOF | 100-000000341 100-100000341WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7543P is 21% better than EPYC 7773X in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7773X has 32 more core than EPYC 7543P. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7773X is better: 26
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7543P is better: 3 Although it should be understood that the summary data in the article above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7773X and AMD EPYC 7543P before making a selection which of the processors to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 7773X Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7543P Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|