 |
AMD EPYC 7702P vs AMD EPYC 9554P |
|
Processor comparisons 27-03-2023
Let's say you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the AMD EPYC 7702P vs AMD EPYC 9554P tests and decide which is better for games or simple use for rendering, streaming, machine learning, programming, video editing. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or different benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications such as VeraCrypt, MATLAB, AIDA64, Furmark, WPrime, Dolphin Emulator, 7zip, Gears 5, SuperPi, Blender, Handbrake, UserBenchmark, Prime95, 3DMark, PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender, PCMark 10, RealBench, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15).
And how good the CPUs are in games: - Valorant
- Valheim
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Last Man Standing
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Fortnite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Borderlands 3
- Halo Infinite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Overwatch
- Death Stranding
- Watch Dogs Legion
- DOOM: Eternal
- Apex Legends
- Fallout 76
- Grand Theft Auto V
After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9554P or AMD EPYC 7702P.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7702P | 70% |
EPYC 9554P | 87% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9554P is 19% better than EPYC 7702P. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7702P | 80% |
EPYC 9554P | 88% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Microsoft Flight Simulator, Ghostrunner, Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Control, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Metro Exodus, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Hitman 3, DOTA 2A, Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL), Battlefield V, Monster Hunter World, Forza Horizon 4.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 141.7 | 155.1 | | Valorant | 161.1 | 176.3 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 90.2 | 98.7 | | Apex Legends | 151.4 | 165.7 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 120.8 | 132.2 | | Overwatch | 130.5 | 142.8 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 111.1 | 121.6 | | DOOM Eternal | 80.5 | 88.1 | | Warzone | 125.6 | 137.5 | | Assassin's Creed | 135.3 | 148.1 | | Valheim | 133.7 | 146.3 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7702P | 18% |
EPYC 9554P | 14% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7702P is more energy efficient than the EPYC 9554P since it has less power consumption: 200W vs. 360W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video rendering or video editing, streaming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7702P |
AMD EPYC 9554P | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 198 | 372 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 8182 | 15207 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 370 | 697 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 18282 | 32229 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 957 | 1705 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 47555 | 83804 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7702P |
AMD EPYC 9554P | | Single-Core | 2135 | 3590 | | Multi-Core | 66158 | 122932 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7702P |
AMD EPYC 9554P | | Single-Core | 1086 | 1540 | | Multi-Core | 52674 | 65817 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 7702P |
AMD EPYC 9554P | | Announcement date | April 01, 2019 | November 10, 2022 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | SP5 | | Core name | Rome | Genoa | | Architecture | Zen 2 | Zen 4 | | Generation | 2 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.35 MHz | 3.75 MHz | | Frequency | 2 MHz | 3.1 MHz | | Cores | 64 | 64 | | Threads | 128 | 128 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 86000 millions | 108000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 200 W | 360 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 208 GByte/s | 460.8 | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | Yes | | Part number | 100-000000047
100-100000047WOF | 100-000000804
100-100000804WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9554P is 35% better than EPYC 7702P in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7702P is better: 1
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9554P is better: 30
However, it should be realized that all the data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the video tests and read the opinion of real owners of AMD EPYC 7702P and AMD EPYC 9554P before deciding which of the processors to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 7702P Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9554P Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
