Processor comparisons 08-01-2022
For example you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the detailed tests Intel Core i9-12900HK vs AMD EPYC 7543P and understand which is better for games or simple use for programming, rendering, streaming, machine learning, video editing. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or various benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as 3DMark, PassMark, WPrime, Geekbench 5.2, Gears 5, RealBench, SuperPi, Blender, Dolphin Emulator, MATLAB, Handbrake, VeraCrypt, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, Prime95, PCMark 10, 7zip, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), DaVinci Resolve Studio, UserBenchmark, Furmark, AIDA64.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - Rainbow Six Siege
- Valorant
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Overwatch
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Apex Legends
- Watch Dogs Legion
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Death Stranding
- Last Man Standing
- Borderlands 3
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fortnite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valheim
- Halo Infinite
- Fallout 76
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Cyberpunk 2077
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7543P or Intel Core i9-12900HK.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i9-12900HK | 75% |
EPYC 7543P | 78% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7543P is 3% better than Core i9-12900HK. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i9-12900HK | 60% |
EPYC 7543P | 77% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: NBA 2K20, Forza Horizon 4, Metro Exodus, Hitman 3, Monster Hunter World, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Microsoft Flight Simulator, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, Control, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Ghostrunner, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Horizon Zero Dawn, DOTA 2A, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 107.2 | 135.9 | | Valorant | 121.8 | 154.5 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 68.2 | 86.5 | | Apex Legends | 114.5 | 145.2 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 91.4 | 115.9 | | Overwatch | 98.7 | 125.1 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 84.1 | 106.6 | | DOOM Eternal | 60.9 | 77.2 | | Warzone | 95.0 | 120.5 | | Assassin's Creed | 102.3 | 129.8 | | Valheim | 101.1 | 128.2 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i9-12900HK | 141% |
EPYC 7543P | 19% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-12900HK is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7543P since it has less power consumption: 45W vs. 225W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, streaming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU turns on all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-12900HK |
AMD EPYC 7543P | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 479 | 182 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 5047 | 7497 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 800 | 341 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 11221 | 15890 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2838 | 840 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 32291 | 41322 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-12900HK |
AMD EPYC 7543P | | Single-Core | 7395 | 1769 | | Multi-Core | 55205 | 60614 |
GeekBench 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-12900HK |
AMD EPYC 7543P | | Single-Core | 1916 | 1306 | | Multi-Core | 12420 | 31025 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i9-12900HK |
AMD EPYC 7543P | | Announcement date | January 07, 2022 | March 15, 2021 | | Type | Laptop | Server | | Socket | FCBGA1744 | SP3 | | Core name | Alder Lake | Milan | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 3 | | Generation | 12 | 3 | | Turbo Frequency | 5 MHz | 3.7 MHz | | Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 2.8 MHz | | Cores | 14 | 32 | | Threads | 20 | 64 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 12400 millions | 68000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 225 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5 5200 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | 6400 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 108 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | | | L2 cache | 8 MB | | | L3 cache | 24 MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | | 100-000000341
100-100000341WOF
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-12900HK is 26% better than EPYC 7543P in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7543P has 18 more core than Core i9-12900HK. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-12900HK is better: 15
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7543P is better: 21
However, it should be realized that all the number that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i9-12900HK and AMD EPYC 7543P before making a decision which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors
• Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Core i9-12900H Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
• Core i9-12900KF Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Core i9-12900F Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Core i9-12900 Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors
• Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
• Core i9-13900K Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Core i9-12900K Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Core i9-12900H Vs EPYC 7543P
|
