 |
AMD EPYC 9554P vs AMD EPYC 9654 |
|
Processor comparisons 11-03-2023
Let's say you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a choice after reading the comprehensive tests AMD EPYC 9554P vs AMD EPYC 9654 and see which is better for games or simple use for streaming, rendering, programming, video editing, machine learning. Here is all information from several benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications such as Furmark, PassMark, Blender, SuperPi, WPrime, VeraCrypt, AIDA64, RealBench, PCMark 10, Gears 5, MATLAB, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, DaVinci Resolve Studio, 3DMark, Handbrake, UserBenchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Prime95, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, 7zip, Dolphin Emulator.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Borderlands 3
- Valorant
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fallout 76
- Fortnite
- Apex Legends
- DOOM: Eternal
- Halo Infinite
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Death Stranding
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Last Man Standing
- Valheim
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Overwatch
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Watch Dogs Legion
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9654 or AMD EPYC 9554P.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 9554P | 87% |
EPYC 9654 | 99% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9654 is 12% better than EPYC 9554P. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 9554P | 88% |
EPYC 9654 | 99% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Metro Exodus, Forza Horizon 4, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, League of Legends (LOL), Ghostrunner, Horizon Zero Dawn, Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Battlefield V, NBA 2K20, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), DOTA 2A, Monster Hunter World, Control, Shadow of the Tomb Raider.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 155.1 | 176.0 | | Valorant | 176.3 | 200.0 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 98.7 | 112.0 | | Apex Legends | 165.7 | 188.0 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 132.2 | 150.0 | | Overwatch | 142.8 | 162.0 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 121.6 | 138.0 | | DOOM Eternal | 88.1 | 100.0 | | Warzone | 137.5 | 156.0 | | Assassin's Creed | 148.1 | 168.0 | | Valheim | 146.3 | 166.0 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 9554P | 14% |
EPYC 9654 | 13% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 9554P is more energy efficient than the EPYC 9654 as it consumes less power: 360W vs. 360W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, machine learning, streaming, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 9554P |
AMD EPYC 9654 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 372 | 495 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 15207 | 20361 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 697 | 930 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 32229 | 43157 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1705 | 2281 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 83804 | 112225 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9554P |
AMD EPYC 9654 | | Single-Core | 3590 | 4805 | | Multi-Core | 122932 | 164622 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9554P |
AMD EPYC 9654 | | Single-Core | 1540 | 1502 | | Multi-Core | 65817 | 86274 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 9554P |
AMD EPYC 9654 | | Announcement date | November 10, 2022 | November 10, 2022 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP5 | SP5 | | Core name | Genoa | Genoa | | Architecture | Zen 4 | Zen 4 | | Generation | 4 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.75 MHz | 3.7 MHz | | Frequency | 3.1 MHz | 2.4 MHz | | Cores | 64 | 96 | | Threads | 128 | 192 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 108000 millions | 116000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 360 W | 360 W | | Memory type | DDR5 | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | | | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 460.8 | 460.8 | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 384MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | | Part number | 100-000000804
100-100000804WOF | 100-000000789
100-100000789WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9554P is 22% better than EPYC 9654 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9654 has 32 more core than EPYC 9554P. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9554P is better: 3
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9654 is better: 24
Although it should be realized that the summary data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of AMD EPYC 9554P and AMD EPYC 9654 before deciding which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 9554P Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9654 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
