Processor comparisons 25-03-2021 If you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the AMD EPYC 7543P vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X tests and decide which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, rendering, programming, streaming, video editing. Here you can find all information from different benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like UserBenchmark, SuperPi, RealBench, Furmark, PCMark 10, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender, 7zip, 3DMark, AIDA64, WPrime, Geekbench 5.2, Handbrake, Dolphin Emulator, MATLAB, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, VeraCrypt, PassMark, Gears 5, Prime95. And how good the CPUs are in games: - DOOM: Eternal
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- Fortnite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valorant
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valheim
- Fallout 76
- Apex Legends
- Overwatch
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Death Stranding
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Last Man Standing
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X or AMD EPYC 7543P.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
EPYC 7543P | 83% |
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | 80% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7543P is 3% better than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 7543P | 77% |
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | 72% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: League of Legends (LOL), Forza Horizon 4, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), DOTA 2A, Control, Monster Hunter World, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Ghostrunner, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Hitman 3, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Metro Exodus, NBA 2K20, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Horizon Zero Dawn, Battlefield V, Half-Life: Alyx.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 135.9 | 126.7 | Valorant | 154.5 | 144.0 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 86.5 | 80.7 | Apex Legends | 145.2 | 135.4 | Call of Duty Warzone | 115.9 | 108.0 | Overwatch | 125.1 | 116.7 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 106.6 | 99.4 | DOOM Eternal | 77.2 | 72.0 | Warzone | 120.5 | 112.3 | Assassin's Creed | 129.8 | 121.0 | Valheim | 128.2 | 119.5 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 7543P | 19% |
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | 15% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7543P is more energy efficient than the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X since it has less power consumption: 225W vs. 280W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, video rendering or video editing, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7543P |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 182 | 209 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 7497 | 5933 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 341 | 509 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 15890 | 13552 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 840 | 1270 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 41322 | 34255 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7543P |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | Single-Core | 1769 | 2663 | Multi-Core | 60614 | 54830 |
GeekBench 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7543P |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | Single-Core | 1306 | 1306 | Multi-Core | 31025 | 25072 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 7543P |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | Announcement date | March 15, 2021 | November 25, 2019 | Type | Server | Desktop | Socket | SP3 | sTRX4 | Core name | Milan | Castle Peak | Architecture | Zen 3 | Zen 2 | Generation | 3 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 4.5 MHz | Frequency | 2.8 MHz | 3.8 MHz | Cores | 32 | 24 | Threads | 64 | 48 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 68000 millions | 22600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 225 W | 280 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | 1.5MB | L2 cache | | 12MB | L3 cache | 256MB | 128MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | 100-000000341 100-100000341WOF
| 100-000000010 100-100000010WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 26% better than EPYC 7543P in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7543P has 8 more core than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7543P is better: 23
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is better: 9 Although it should be realized that all the number that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of AMD EPYC 7543P and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X before making a choice which of the CPUs to buy for gaming. • Cinebench r15 score • Cinebench r20 score • Cinebench r23 score • GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Core i9-13900K Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Core i9-12900K Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7643 • Core i9-12900HK Vs EPYC 7543P • Core i9-12900H Vs EPYC 7543P
• Cinebench r15 score • Cinebench r20 score • Cinebench r23 score • GeekBench 5 score • Fortnite gaming benchmark • Roblox gaming benchmark • Valorant gaming benchmark • Cyberpunk 2077 gaming benchmark • Apex Legends gaming benchmark • Call of Duty: Warzone gaming benchmark • Overwatch gaming benchmark • Red Dead Redemption 2 gaming benchmark • DOOM Eternal gaming benchmark • Assassin's Creed gaming benchmark • GTA 5 gaming benchmark • PUBG gaming benchmark
Versus Battle of the Processors • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Core i9-13900K Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs EPYC 7702 • EPYC 7763 Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • EPYC 7713P Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • EPYC 75F3 Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • EPYC 7713 Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • EPYC 7742 Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
|