 |
AMD EPYC 7552 vs AMD EPYC 9354P |
|
Processor comparisons 19-03-2023
Let's say you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the AMD EPYC 7552 vs AMD EPYC 9354P tests and see which is better for games or normal use for video editing, programming, streaming, rendering, machine learning. Here you can find useful information from different benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software such as RealBench, GeekBench 6, 5.2, SuperPi, VeraCrypt, MATLAB, DaVinci Resolve Studio, PassMark, Blender, Dolphin Emulator, Handbrake, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, UserBenchmark, Furmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 7zip, 3DMark, Gears 5, WPrime, AIDA64, Blender, Prime95, PCMark 10.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - DOOM: Eternal
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fallout 76
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- Last Man Standing
- Apex Legends
- Valheim
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fortnite
- Death Stranding
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Overwatch
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valorant
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9354P or AMD EPYC 7552.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7552 | 72% |
EPYC 9354P | 70% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7552 is 2% better than EPYC 9354P. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7552 | 77% |
EPYC 9354P | 75% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Hitman 3, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter World, Forza Horizon 4, Half-Life: Alyx, Microsoft Flight Simulator, NBA 2K20, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), DOTA 2A, League of Legends (LOL), Metro Exodus, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Battlefield V, Control, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, Horizon Zero Dawn.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 137.0 | 132.6 | | Valorant | 155.7 | 150.6 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 87.2 | 84.4 | | Apex Legends | 146.3 | 141.6 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 116.8 | 113.0 | | Overwatch | 126.1 | 122.0 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 107.4 | 103.9 | | DOOM Eternal | 77.8 | 75.3 | | Warzone | 121.4 | 117.5 | | Assassin's Creed | 130.8 | 126.5 | | Valheim | 129.2 | 125.0 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7552 | 18% |
EPYC 9354P | 26% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 9354P is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7552 since it has less power consumption: 200W vs. 280W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7552 |
AMD EPYC 9354P | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 213 | 170 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 8977 | 8374 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 528 | 350 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 19032 | 17783 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1001 | 911 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 49501 | 46297 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7552 |
AMD EPYC 9354P | | Single-Core | 2844 | 2087 | | Multi-Core | 72727 | 67926 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7552 |
AMD EPYC 9354P | | Single-Core | 1082 | 2223 | | Multi-Core | 48030 | 43685 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 7552 |
AMD EPYC 9354P | | Announcement date | October 01, 2020 | November 10, 2022 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | SP5 | | Core name | Rome | Genoa | | Architecture | Zen 2 | Zen 4 | | Generation | 2 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.3 MHz | 3.8 MHz | | Frequency | 2.2 MHz | 3.25 MHz | | Cores | 48 | 32 | | Threads | 96 | 64 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 64000 millions | 64000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 200 W | 280 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | | 460.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 192MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | Yes | | Part number | 100-000000076
100-100000076WOF | 100-000000805
100-100000805WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9354P is 32% better than EPYC 7552 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7552 has 16 more core than EPYC 9354P. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7552 is better: 23
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9354P is better: 11
All the figures in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the opinion of real owners of AMD EPYC 7552 and AMD EPYC 9354P before making a selection which of the processors to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 7552 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9354P Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
