Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
AMD EPYC 7642 vs AMD EPYC 7552 gaming benchmark

AMD EPYC 7642 vs AMD EPYC 7552

Processor comparisons   19-03-2023
   You may have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests AMD EPYC 7642 vs AMD EPYC 7552 and understand which is better for games or simple use for streaming, video editing, rendering, machine learning, programming. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like RealBench, Dolphin Emulator, PCMark 10, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 3DMark, UserBenchmark, Handbrake, MATLAB, Prime95, AIDA64, PassMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, WPrime, Gears 5, Blender, SuperPi, Furmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, VeraCrypt, 7zip.
   Gaming performance of CPUs in:
  • Borderlands 3
  • Valheim
  • Last Man Standing
  • World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
  • Apex Legends
  • Watch Dogs Legion
  • Halo Infinite
  • Assassin's Creed Valhalla
  • Overwatch
  • Valorant
  • DOOM: Eternal
  • Fallout 76
  • Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
  • Death Stranding
  • Cyberpunk 2077
  • Red Dead Redemption 2
  • Rainbow Six Siege
  • Fortnite
  • Grand Theft Auto V

   After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7552 or AMD EPYC 7642.


 
AMD EPYC 7642
AMD EPYC 7552

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
EPYC 764268% EPYC 755272%
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7552 is 5% better than EPYC 7642. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.

Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.
EPYC 764273% EPYC 755277%
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Hitman 3, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Forza Horizon 4, Metro Exodus, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Horizon Zero Dawn, NBA 2K20, Half-Life: Alyx, Ghostrunner, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, League of Legends (LOL), Control, Monster Hunter World, DOTA 2A, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Battlefield V.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite129.7137.0
Valorant147.3155.7
Cyberpunk 207782.587.2
Apex Legends138.5146.3
Call of Duty Warzone110.5116.8
Overwatch119.3126.1
Red Dead Redemption 2101.7107.4
DOOM Eternal73.777.8
Warzone114.9121.4
Assassin's Creed123.8130.8
Valheim122.3129.2
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.


Power consumption
EPYC 764213% EPYC 755218%
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7552 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7642 since it has less power consumption: 225W vs. 200W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.

Software benchmarks

If you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, video rendering or video editing, programming, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance
AMD EPYC 7642 AMD EPYC 7552
Cinbench 15 Single-core177213
Cinbench 15 Multi-core75948977
Cinbench 20 Single-core443528
Cinbench 20 Multi-core1610419032
Cinbench 23 Single-core8441001
Cinbench 23 Multi-core4189049501

Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
AMD EPYC 7642 AMD EPYC 7552
Single-Core24042844
Multi-Core6154672727

GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
AMD EPYC 7642 AMD EPYC 7552
Single-Core9181082
Multi-Core4083648030

Comparison of specifications

In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.

AMD EPYC 7642 AMD EPYC 7552
Announcement dateOctober 01, 2020October 01, 2020
TypeServerServer
SocketSP3SP3
Core nameRomeRome
ArchitectureZen 2Zen 2
Generation22
Turbo Frequency3.3 MHz3.3 MHz
Frequency2.3 MHz2.2 MHz
Cores4848
Threads9696
Bus rate
Bit6464
Lithography7 nm7 nm
Transistors count64000 millions64000 millions
Power consumption (TDP)225 W200 W
Memory typeDDR4DDR4
Max. Memory
Memory Frequency32003200
Memory bandwidth208 GByte/s
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache256MB192MB
OverclockingNoNo
Supports ECCNoNo
Part number100-000000074
100-100000074WOF
100-000000076
100-100000076WOF
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7642 is 4% better than EPYC 7552 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).

Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7642 is better: 3
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7552 is better: 22
   Although it should be understood that all the data in the article above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of AMD EPYC 7642 and AMD EPYC 7552 before making a choice which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 7642 - all data

•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 6, 5.2 score
AMD EPYC 7552 - all data

•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 6, 5.2 score


AMD EPYC 7642 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+


AMD EPYC 7552 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands