 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6434H vs AMD EPYC 7552 |
|
Processor comparisons 29-03-2023
Perhaps you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a choice after reading the full tests Intel Xeon Gold 6434H vs AMD EPYC 7552 and see which is better for games or normal use for programming, video editing, rendering, streaming, machine learning. Here you can find all information from several benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like SuperPi, PassMark, Handbrake, UserBenchmark, Dolphin Emulator, 3DMark, Blender, Gears 5, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 7zip, Prime95, RealBench, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, MATLAB, AIDA64, Furmark, VeraCrypt, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, PCMark 10, WPrime.
Gaming performance of processors in: - World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valorant
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fallout 76
- Death Stranding
- Apex Legends
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Borderlands 3
- Last Man Standing
- Halo Infinite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fortnite
- Overwatch
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valheim
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- DOOM: Eternal
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7552 or Intel Xeon Gold 6434H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Xeon Gold 6434H | 62% |
EPYC 7552 | 72% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7552 is 13% better than Xeon Gold 6434H. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Xeon Gold 6434H | 64% |
EPYC 7552 | 77% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Microsoft Flight Simulator, Forza Horizon 4, Hitman 3, Control, NBA 2K20, League of Legends (LOL), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Battlefield V, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Horizon Zero Dawn, Half-Life: Alyx, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Metro Exodus, Monster Hunter World, Ghostrunner, DOTA 2A, Shadow of the Tomb Raider.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 113.1 | 137.0 | | Valorant | 128.5 | 155.7 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 71.9 | 87.2 | | Apex Legends | 120.8 | 146.3 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 96.4 | 116.8 | | Overwatch | 104.1 | 126.1 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 88.6 | 107.4 | | DOOM Eternal | 64.2 | 77.8 | | Warzone | 100.2 | 121.4 | | Assassin's Creed | 107.9 | 130.8 | | Valheim | 106.6 | 129.2 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Xeon Gold 6434H | 27% |
EPYC 7552 | 18% |
To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon Gold 6434H is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7552 as it consumes less power: 195W vs. 200W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, machine learning, streaming, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor turns on all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon Gold 6434H |
AMD EPYC 7552 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 886 | 213 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2879 | 8977 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 1976 | 528 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 7114 | 19032 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1374 | 1001 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 40535 | 49501 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Gold 6434H |
AMD EPYC 7552 | | Single-Core | 12581 | 2844 | | Multi-Core | 41263 | 72727 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Gold 6434H |
AMD EPYC 7552 | | Single-Core | 1615 | 1082 | | Multi-Core | 24562 | 48030 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Xeon Gold 6434H |
AMD EPYC 7552 | | Announcement date | March 11, 2023 | October 01, 2020 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | FCLGA4677 | SP3 | | Core name | Sapphire Rapids | Rome | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 2 | | Generation | 4 | 2 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.1 MHz | 3.3 MHz | | Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 2.2 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 48 | | Threads | 16 | 96 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 36000 millions | 64000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 195 W | 200 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s 1DPC Up to DDR5 4400 MT/s 2DPC | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | | | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 22.5 MB | 192MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | No | | Part number | | 100-000000076
100-100000076WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon Gold 6434H is 40% better than EPYC 7552 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7552 has 40 more core than Xeon Gold 6434H. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Gold 6434H is better: 14
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7552 is better: 20
Although it should be understood that all the number that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Xeon Gold 6434H and AMD EPYC 7552 before making a decision which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Xeon Gold 6434H Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7552 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
