 |
AMD EPYC 7552 vs AMD EPYC 9124 |
|
Processor comparisons 19-03-2023
Let's say you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the AMD EPYC 7552 vs AMD EPYC 9124 tests and understand which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, rendering, video editing, streaming, programming. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or different benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like SuperPi, WPrime, MATLAB, PassMark, 7zip, UserBenchmark, Dolphin Emulator, Gears 5, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Handbrake, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), DaVinci Resolve Studio, VeraCrypt, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, RealBench, AIDA64, Furmark, Prime95, 3DMark, PCMark 10, Blender.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Red Dead Redemption 2
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Apex Legends
- Cyberpunk 2077
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valorant
- Valheim
- Death Stranding
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Halo Infinite
- Fortnite
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Last Man Standing
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fallout 76
- Borderlands 3
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Overwatch
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9124 or AMD EPYC 7552.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7552 | 72% |
EPYC 9124 | 62% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7552 is 13% better than EPYC 9124. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7552 | 77% |
EPYC 9124 | 64% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Monster Hunter World, Half-Life: Alyx, League of Legends (LOL), Battlefield V, NBA 2K20, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Hitman 3, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Horizon Zero Dawn, Forza Horizon 4, Microsoft Flight Simulator, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Control, Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, DOTA 2A, Metro Exodus.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 137.0 | 112.7 | | Valorant | 155.7 | 128.0 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 87.2 | 71.7 | | Apex Legends | 146.3 | 120.3 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 116.8 | 96.0 | | Overwatch | 126.1 | 103.7 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 107.4 | 88.3 | | DOOM Eternal | 77.8 | 64.0 | | Warzone | 121.4 | 99.9 | | Assassin's Creed | 130.8 | 107.5 | | Valheim | 129.2 | 106.3 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7552 | 18% |
EPYC 9124 | 20% |
To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 9124 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7552 as it consumes less power: 200W vs. 200W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor turns on all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7552 |
AMD EPYC 9124 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 213 | 110 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 8977 | 5178 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 528 | 220 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 19032 | 10991 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1001 | 566 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 49501 | 28606 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7552 |
AMD EPYC 9124 | | Single-Core | 2844 | 1293 | | Multi-Core | 72727 | 41968 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7552 |
AMD EPYC 9124 | | Single-Core | 1082 | 1206 | | Multi-Core | 48030 | 24169 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 7552 |
AMD EPYC 9124 | | Announcement date | October 01, 2020 | November 10, 2022 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | SP5 | | Core name | Rome | Genoa | | Architecture | Zen 2 | Zen 4 | | Generation | 2 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.3 MHz | 3.7 MHz | | Frequency | 2.2 MHz | 3 MHz | | Cores | 48 | 16 | | Threads | 96 | 32 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 64000 millions | 64000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 200 W | 200 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 192MB | 64MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | Yes | | Part number | 100-000000076
100-100000076WOF | 100-000000802
100-100000802WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9124 is 26% better than EPYC 7552 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7552 has 32 more core than EPYC 9124. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7552 is better: 22
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9124 is better: 11
Although it should be understood that all the data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of real owners of AMD EPYC 7552 and AMD EPYC 9124 before making a decision which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 7552 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9124 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
