 |
AMD EPYC 7552 vs AMD EPYC 9174F |
|
Processor comparisons 19-03-2023
You may have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests AMD EPYC 7552 vs AMD EPYC 9174F and understand which is better for games or simple use for programming, rendering, video editing, machine learning, streaming. Here is all information from many benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Blender, 3DMark, 7zip, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Furmark, AIDA64, GeekBench 6, 5.2, RealBench, Prime95, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Dolphin Emulator, MATLAB, SuperPi, PCMark 10, Gears 5, PassMark, Handbrake, VeraCrypt, Blender, WPrime, DaVinci Resolve Studio, UserBenchmark.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Valheim
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Last Man Standing
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Death Stranding
- Apex Legends
- Fallout 76
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valorant
- Halo Infinite
- Overwatch
- Borderlands 3
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fortnite
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9174F or AMD EPYC 7552.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7552 | 72% |
EPYC 9174F | 66% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7552 is 8% better than EPYC 9174F. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7552 | 77% |
EPYC 9174F | 70% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Hitman 3, League of Legends (LOL), NBA 2K20, Half-Life: Alyx, DOTA 2A, Monster Hunter World, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Battlefield V, Horizon Zero Dawn, Metro Exodus, Ghostrunner, Forza Horizon 4, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Control, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Shadow of the Tomb Raider.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 137.0 | 123.8 | | Valorant | 155.7 | 140.7 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 87.2 | 78.8 | | Apex Legends | 146.3 | 132.2 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 116.8 | 105.5 | | Overwatch | 126.1 | 113.9 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 107.4 | 97.1 | | DOOM Eternal | 77.8 | 70.3 | | Warzone | 121.4 | 109.7 | | Assassin's Creed | 130.8 | 118.2 | | Valheim | 129.2 | 116.7 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7552 | 18% |
EPYC 9174F | 18% |
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video rendering or video editing, programming, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7552 |
AMD EPYC 9174F | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 213 | 134 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 8977 | 6722 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 528 | 277 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 19032 | 14279 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1001 | 727 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 49501 | 37179 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7552 |
AMD EPYC 9174F | | Single-Core | 2844 | 1672 | | Multi-Core | 72727 | 54549 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7552 |
AMD EPYC 9174F | | Single-Core | 1082 | 1781 | | Multi-Core | 48030 | 35081 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 7552 |
AMD EPYC 9174F | | Announcement date | October 01, 2020 | November 10, 2022 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | SP5 | | Core name | Rome | Genoa | | Architecture | Zen 2 | Zen 4 | | Generation | 2 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.3 MHz | 4.4 MHz | | Frequency | 2.2 MHz | 4.1 MHz | | Cores | 48 | 16 | | Threads | 96 | 32 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 64000 millions | 64000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 200 W | 320 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 192MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | Yes | | Part number | 100-000000076
100-100000076WOF | 100-000000796
100-100000796WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9174F is 46% better than EPYC 7552 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7552 has 32 more core than EPYC 9174F. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7552 is better: 23
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9174F is better: 11
However, it should be understood that the summary data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7552 and AMD EPYC 9174F before making a choice which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 7552 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9174F Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
