 |
AMD EPYC 7552 vs AMD EPYC 9274F |
|
Processor comparisons 19-03-2023
If there are difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests AMD EPYC 7552 vs AMD EPYC 9274F and understand which is better for games or simple use for video editing, programming, rendering, machine learning, streaming. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like DaVinci Resolve Studio, Dolphin Emulator, RealBench, PCMark 10, PassMark, Blender, Handbrake, GeekBench 6, 5.2, SuperPi, AIDA64, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, 3DMark, Gears 5, VeraCrypt, 7zip, Blender, Prime95, UserBenchmark, WPrime, Furmark, MATLAB.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Halo Infinite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fallout 76
- Valorant
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valheim
- Overwatch
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Apex Legends
- Death Stranding
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Borderlands 3
- Last Man Standing
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fortnite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9274F or AMD EPYC 7552.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7552 | 72% |
EPYC 9274F | 69% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7552 is 4% better than EPYC 9274F. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7552 | 77% |
EPYC 9274F | 73% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Control, Forza Horizon 4, Metro Exodus, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), League of Legends (LOL), Monster Hunter World, DOTA 2A, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Horizon Zero Dawn, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Battlefield V, NBA 2K20, Ghostrunner, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Hitman 3, Half-Life: Alyx, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 137.0 | 129.7 | | Valorant | 155.7 | 147.4 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 87.2 | 82.5 | | Apex Legends | 146.3 | 138.5 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 116.8 | 110.5 | | Overwatch | 126.1 | 119.4 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 107.4 | 101.7 | | DOOM Eternal | 77.8 | 73.7 | | Warzone | 121.4 | 114.9 | | Assassin's Creed | 130.8 | 123.8 | | Valheim | 129.2 | 122.3 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7552 | 18% |
EPYC 9274F | 21% |
To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 9274F is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7552 since it has less power consumption: 200W vs. 320W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7552 |
AMD EPYC 9274F | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 213 | 154 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 8977 | 7827 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 528 | 321 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 19032 | 16627 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1001 | 846 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 49501 | 43295 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7552 |
AMD EPYC 9274F | | Single-Core | 2844 | 1946 | | Multi-Core | 72727 | 63524 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7552 |
AMD EPYC 9274F | | Single-Core | 1082 | 2073 | | Multi-Core | 48030 | 40852 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 7552 |
AMD EPYC 9274F | | Announcement date | October 01, 2020 | November 10, 2022 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | SP5 | | Core name | Rome | Genoa | | Architecture | Zen 2 | Zen 4 | | Generation | 2 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.3 MHz | 4.3 MHz | | Frequency | 2.2 MHz | 4.05 MHz | | Cores | 48 | 24 | | Threads | 96 | 48 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 64000 millions | 64000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 200 W | 320 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | | 460.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 192MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | Yes | | Part number | 100-000000076
100-100000076WOF | 100-000000794
100-000000794WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9274F is 45% better than EPYC 7552 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7552 has 24 more core than EPYC 9274F. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7552 is better: 23
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9274F is better: 11
However, it should be understood that all the number in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of real owners of AMD EPYC 7552 and AMD EPYC 9274F before deciding which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 7552 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9274F Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
