 |
Intel Xeon Gold 5416S vs AMD EPYC 7552 |
|
Processor comparisons 27-04-2023
Let's say you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Xeon Gold 5416S vs AMD EPYC 7552 and decide which is better for games or normal use for programming, streaming, video editing, rendering, machine learning. Here you can find useful information from various benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as DaVinci Resolve Studio, Dolphin Emulator, Blender, Furmark, SuperPi, Prime95, VeraCrypt, GeekBench 6, 5.2, AIDA64, RealBench, UserBenchmark, 7zip, Gears 5, WPrime, PCMark 10, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, 3DMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Handbrake, MATLAB, PassMark, Blender.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Last Man Standing
- Halo Infinite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valheim
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valorant
- Apex Legends
- Overwatch
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Death Stranding
- DOOM: Eternal
- Borderlands 3
- Fallout 76
- Fortnite
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7552 or Intel Xeon Gold 5416S.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Xeon Gold 5416S | 64% |
EPYC 7552 | 72% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7552 is 11% better than Xeon Gold 5416S. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Xeon Gold 5416S | 66% |
EPYC 7552 | 77% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Control, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), League of Legends (LOL), Ghostrunner, DOTA 2A, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Forza Horizon 4, Metro Exodus, Horizon Zero Dawn, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Battlefield V, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3, NBA 2K20, Monster Hunter World.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 116.9 | 137.0 | | Valorant | 132.8 | 155.7 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 74.4 | 87.2 | | Apex Legends | 124.9 | 146.3 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 99.6 | 116.8 | | Overwatch | 107.6 | 126.1 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 91.7 | 107.4 | | DOOM Eternal | 66.4 | 77.8 | | Warzone | 103.6 | 121.4 | | Assassin's Creed | 111.6 | 130.8 | | Valheim | 110.2 | 129.2 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Xeon Gold 5416S | 26% |
EPYC 7552 | 18% |
To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon Gold 5416S is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7552 since it has less power consumption: 150W vs. 200W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, programming, video editing or video rendering, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon Gold 5416S |
AMD EPYC 7552 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 1024 | 213 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 3295 | 8977 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 2267 | 528 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 8125 | 19032 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1579 | 1001 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 46229 | 49501 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Gold 5416S |
AMD EPYC 7552 | | Single-Core | 14358 | 2844 | | Multi-Core | 47058 | 72727 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Gold 5416S |
AMD EPYC 7552 | | Single-Core | 1186 | 1082 | | Multi-Core | 28321 | 48030 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Xeon Gold 5416S |
AMD EPYC 7552 | | Announcement date | March 24, 2023 | October 01, 2020 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | FCLGA4677 | SP3 | | Core name | Sapphire Rapids | Rome | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 2 | | Generation | 4 | 2 | | Turbo Frequency | 4 MHz | 3.3 MHz | | Frequency | 2 MHz | 2.2 MHz | | Cores | 16 | 48 | | Threads | 32 | 96 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 36000 millions | 64000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 150 W | 200 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4400 MT/s 1DPC and 2DPC | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | | | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 30 MB | 192MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | No | | Part number | | 100-000000076
100-100000076WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7552 is 9% better than Xeon Gold 5416S in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7552 has 32 more core than Xeon Gold 5416S. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Gold 5416S is better: 13
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7552 is better: 21
However, it should be understood that all the data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Xeon Gold 5416S and AMD EPYC 7552 before making a selection which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Xeon Gold 5416S Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7552 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
