Processor comparisons 25-03-2021
Let's say you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a choice after reading the comprehensive tests AMD EPYC 7513 vs AMD EPYC 7763 and understand which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, rendering, video editing, programming, streaming. Here is all information from many benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, 3DMark, Blender, PCMark 10, Geekbench 5.2, PassMark, Furmark, AIDA64, UserBenchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), VeraCrypt, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Dolphin Emulator, SuperPi, Prime95, Handbrake, MATLAB, WPrime, Blender, RealBench, 7zip, Gears 5.
And how good the processors are in games: - Valheim
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- DOOM: Eternal
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Last Man Standing
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fallout 76
- Fortnite
- Halo Infinite
- Death Stranding
- Apex Legends
- Overwatch
- Valorant
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Borderlands 3
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Red Dead Redemption 2
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7763 or AMD EPYC 7513.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7513 | 75% |
EPYC 7763 | 82% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7763 is 8% better than EPYC 7513. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7513 | 75% |
EPYC 7763 | 68% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Monster Hunter World, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Hitman 3, Horizon Zero Dawn, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Half-Life: Alyx, Ghostrunner, Control, League of Legends (LOL), DOTA 2A, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Forza Horizon 4, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Metro Exodus, NBA 2K20, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Battlefield V.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 133.5 | 121.4 | | Valorant | 151.7 | 137.9 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 85.0 | 77.2 | | Apex Legends | 142.6 | 129.6 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 113.8 | 103.4 | | Overwatch | 122.9 | 111.7 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 104.7 | 95.2 | | DOOM Eternal | 75.9 | 69.0 | | Warzone | 118.4 | 107.6 | | Assassin's Creed | 127.5 | 115.8 | | Valheim | 125.9 | 114.5 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7513 | 23% |
EPYC 7763 | 15% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7513 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7763 since it has less power consumption: 200W vs. 280W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, streaming, video editing or video rendering, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7513 |
AMD EPYC 7763 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 162 | 210 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 6680 | 8667 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 304 | 414 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 14158 | 21470 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 748 | 970 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 36818 | 47776 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7513 |
AMD EPYC 7763 | | Single-Core | 1576 | 2446 | | Multi-Core | 54007 | 70081 |
GeekBench 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7513 |
AMD EPYC 7763 | | Single-Core | 1403 | 1303 | | Multi-Core | 29463 | 21589 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 7513 |
AMD EPYC 7763 | | Announcement date | March 15, 2021 | March 15, 2021 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | SP3 | | Core name | Milan | Milan | | Architecture | Zen 3 | Zen 3 | | Generation | 3 | 3 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.65 MHz | 3.5 MHz | | Frequency | 2.6 MHz | 2.45 MHz | | Cores | 32 | 64 | | Threads | 64 | 128 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 68000 millions | 86000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 200 W | 280 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 128MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | 100-000000334
100-100000334WOF
| 100-000000312
100-100000312WOF
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7513 is 5% better than EPYC 7763 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7763 has 32 more core than EPYC 7513. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7513 is better: 16
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7763 is better: 12
All the number in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of real owners of AMD EPYC 7513 and AMD EPYC 7763 before making a selection which of the processors to buy for gaming.
• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors
• Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Vs EPYC 7513
• Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
• Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
• Core i9-12900KS Vs EPYC 7513
• Core i9-13900K Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors
• Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Vs EPYC 7763
• Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX Vs EPYC 7763
• Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX Vs EPYC 7763
• Core i9-12900KS Vs EPYC 7763
• Core i9-13900K Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 75F3 Vs EPYC 7763
• EPYC 7713 Vs EPYC 7763
• Core i9-12950HX Vs EPYC 7763
• Core i9-12900HX Vs EPYC 7763
• EPYC 7663 Vs EPYC 7763
|
