Processor comparisons 25-03-2021 Let's say you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a decision after reading the detailed tests AMD EPYC 7513 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX and decide which is better for games or simple use for programming, rendering, video editing, machine learning, streaming. Here you can find all information from real streaming and video editing tests or different benchmarks. A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like WPrime, AIDA64, RealBench, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Dolphin Emulator, Prime95, VeraCrypt, Handbrake, Gears 5, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, 7zip, UserBenchmark, Geekbench 5.2, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Furmark, 3DMark, Blender, MATLAB, PCMark 10, PassMark, SuperPi. And how good the CPUs are in games: - DOOM: Eternal
- Halo Infinite
- Valheim
- Last Man Standing
- Death Stranding
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Overwatch
- Apex Legends
- Valorant
- Fortnite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Borderlands 3
- Fallout 76
- Watch Dogs Legion
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX or AMD EPYC 7513.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
EPYC 7513 | 75% |
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | 91% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is 17% better than EPYC 7513. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 7513 | 75% |
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | 81% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Forza Horizon 4, Horizon Zero Dawn, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Hitman 3, Battlefield V, Half-Life: Alyx, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, League of Legends (LOL), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), NBA 2K20, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Ghostrunner, Metro Exodus, DOTA 2A, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Control, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Monster Hunter World.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 133.5 | 144.2 | Valorant | 151.7 | 163.8 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 85.0 | 91.7 | Apex Legends | 142.6 | 154.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 113.8 | 122.9 | Overwatch | 122.9 | 132.7 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 104.7 | 113.0 | DOOM Eternal | 75.9 | 81.9 | Warzone | 118.4 | 127.8 | Assassin's Creed | 127.5 | 137.6 | Valheim | 125.9 | 136.0 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 7513 | 23% |
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | 15% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7513 is more energy efficient than the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX as it consumes less power: 200W vs. 280W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7513 |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 162 | 219 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 6680 | 11525 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 304 | 477 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 14158 | 24463 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 748 | 1231 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 36818 | 73220 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7513 |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | Single-Core | 1576 | 2691 | Multi-Core | 54007 | 89165 |
GeekBench 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7513 |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | Single-Core | 1403 | 1268 | Multi-Core | 29463 | 36342 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 7513 |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | Announcement date | March 15, 2021 | July 14, 2020 | Type | Server | Desktop | Socket | SP3 | sTRX4 | Core name | Milan | Castle Peak | Architecture | Zen 3 | Zen 2 | Generation | 3 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 3.65 MHz | 4.2 MHz | Frequency | 2.6 MHz | 2.7 MHz | Cores | 32 | 64 | Threads | 64 | 128 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 68000 millions | 22600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 200 W | 280 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | 4MB | L2 cache | | 32MB | L3 cache | 128MB | 256MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | 100-000000334 100-100000334WOF
| 100-000000087
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is 3% better than EPYC 7513 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX has 32 more core than EPYC 7513. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7513 is better: 5
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is better: 27 Although it should be understood that the summary data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7513 and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX before making a choice which CPU to buy for gaming and which not. • Cinebench r15 score • Cinebench r20 score • Cinebench r23 score • GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors • Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Core i9-13900K Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
• Cinebench r23 score • Cinebench r20 score • Cinebench r15 score • GeekBench 5 score • Cyberpunk 2077 gaming benchmark • Fortnite gaming benchmark • Call of Duty: Warzone gaming benchmark • Assassin's Creed gaming benchmark • PUBG gaming benchmark • DOOM Eternal gaming benchmark • Overwatch gaming benchmark • Roblox gaming benchmark • GTA 5 gaming benchmark • Apex Legends gaming benchmark • Red Dead Redemption 2 gaming benchmark • Valorant gaming benchmark
Versus Battle of the Processors • Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Ryzen Threadripper 3990X Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Core i9-13900K Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • EPYC 7702 Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • EPYC 7742 Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Ryzen Threadripper 3970X Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Core i9-12900K Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Core i9-12900H Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Ryzen Threadripper 3960X Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Core i9-12900KF Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
|