Processor comparisons 25-03-2021
For example you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a choice by looking at the AMD EPYC 7313 vs AMD EPYC 7763 tests and decide which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, video editing, streaming, rendering, programming. Here is useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or several benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as RealBench, PassMark, Handbrake, Furmark, Gears 5, 7zip, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender, WPrime, SuperPi, Prime95, UserBenchmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Dolphin Emulator, PCMark 10, Geekbench 5.2, Blender, 3DMark, VeraCrypt, MATLAB, AIDA64, Cinebench 23 (20, 15).
And how good the processors are in games: - Overwatch
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fortnite
- Halo Infinite
- Valorant
- Valheim
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Death Stranding
- Apex Legends
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Last Man Standing
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Borderlands 3
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fallout 76
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7763 or AMD EPYC 7313.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7313 | 68% |
EPYC 7763 | 82% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7763 is 17% better than EPYC 7313. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7313 | 67% |
EPYC 7763 | 68% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Battlefield V, Monster Hunter World, Forza Horizon 4, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), DOTA 2A, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, NBA 2K20, Metro Exodus, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Ghostrunner, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Half-Life: Alyx, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), League of Legends (LOL), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Hitman 3, Horizon Zero Dawn, Control.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 118.3 | 121.4 | | Valorant | 134.4 | 137.9 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 75.3 | 77.2 | | Apex Legends | 126.3 | 129.6 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 100.8 | 103.4 | | Overwatch | 108.9 | 111.7 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 92.7 | 95.2 | | DOOM Eternal | 67.2 | 69.0 | | Warzone | 104.8 | 107.6 | | Assassin's Creed | 112.9 | 115.8 | | Valheim | 111.6 | 114.5 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7313 | 24% |
EPYC 7763 | 15% |
To make a final choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7313 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7763 as it consumes less power: 155W vs. 280W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7313 |
AMD EPYC 7763 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 117 | 210 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 4789 | 8667 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 217 | 414 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 10152 | 21470 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 536 | 970 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 26398 | 47776 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7313 |
AMD EPYC 7763 | | Single-Core | 1207 | 2446 | | Multi-Core | 38721 | 70081 |
GeekBench 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7313 |
AMD EPYC 7763 | | Single-Core | 1118 | 1303 | | Multi-Core | 19594 | 21589 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 7313 |
AMD EPYC 7763 | | Announcement date | March 15, 2021 | March 15, 2021 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | SP3 | | Core name | Milan | Milan | | Architecture | Zen 3 | Zen 3 | | Generation | 3 | 3 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 3.5 MHz | | Frequency | 3 MHz | 2.45 MHz | | Cores | 16 | 64 | | Threads | 32 | 128 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 54000 millions | 86000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 155 W | 280 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 128MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | 100-000000329
100-100000329WOF
| 100-000000312
100-100000312WOF
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7313 is 18% better than EPYC 7763 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7763 has 48 more core than EPYC 7313. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7313 is better: 3
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7763 is better: 25
Although it should be realized that all the data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the opinion of real owners of AMD EPYC 7313 and AMD EPYC 7763 before making a decision which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Core i9-12900K Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Core i9-12900HK Vs EPYC 7313
• Core i9-12900H Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors
• Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Vs EPYC 7763
• Core i9-13900K Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 75F3 Vs EPYC 7763
• EPYC 7713 Vs EPYC 7763
• EPYC 7663 Vs EPYC 7763
• EPYC 7543P Vs EPYC 7763
• Core i9-12900K Vs EPYC 7763
• EPYC 7643 Vs EPYC 7763
• Core i9-12900H Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
|
