|
Intel Core i9-13900KF vs AMD EPYC 7763 |
|
Processor comparisons 29-09-2022 Let's say you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the full tests Intel Core i9-13900KF vs AMD EPYC 7763 and understand which is better for games or normal use for programming, rendering, machine learning, streaming, video editing. Here is useful information from many benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A careful analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like PassMark, AIDA64, Blender, PCMark 10, RealBench, MATLAB, VeraCrypt, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Furmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, UserBenchmark, 3DMark, Dolphin Emulator, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Handbrake, 7zip, SuperPi, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Gears 5, Prime95, WPrime. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Last Man Standing
- Halo Infinite
- Valheim
- Fallout 76
- Borderlands 3
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Overwatch
- Valorant
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Apex Legends
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fortnite
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Death Stranding
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7763 or Intel Core i9-13900KF.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i9-13900KF | 68% |
EPYC 7763 | 71% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7763 is 4% better than Core i9-13900KF. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i9-13900KF | 65% |
EPYC 7763 | 62% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Battlefield V, Hitman 3, Horizon Zero Dawn, Metro Exodus, Ghostrunner, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), NBA 2K20, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Control, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Monster Hunter World, League of Legends (LOL), Forza Horizon 4, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Microsoft Flight Simulator, DOTA 2A, Half-Life: Alyx.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 115.3 | 110.0 | Valorant | 131.0 | 125.0 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 73.3 | 70.0 | Apex Legends | 123.1 | 117.5 | Call of Duty Warzone | 98.2 | 93.8 | Overwatch | 106.1 | 101.3 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 90.4 | 86.3 | DOOM Eternal | 65.5 | 62.5 | Warzone | 102.2 | 97.5 | Assassin's Creed | 110.0 | 105.0 | Valheim | 108.7 | 103.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i9-13900KF | 60% |
EPYC 7763 | 15% | To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-13900KF is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7763 as it consumes less power: 125W vs. 280W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
AMD EPYC 7763 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 525 | 210 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 5528 | 8667 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 875 | 414 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 12292 | 21470 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 3109 | 970 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 35375 | 47776 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
AMD EPYC 7763 | Single-Core | 2841 | 2446 | Multi-Core | 60297 | 70081 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
AMD EPYC 7763 | Single-Core | 2287 | 1303 | Multi-Core | 26728 | 21589 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i9-13900KF |
AMD EPYC 7763 | Announcement date | September 15, 2022 | March 15, 2021 | Type | Desktop | Server | Socket | FCLGA1700 | SP3 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Milan | Architecture | x86 | Zen 3 | Generation | 13 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 5.8 MHz | 3.5 MHz | Frequency | 4.3 MHz | 2.45 MHz | Cores | 24 | 64 | Threads | 32 | 128 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 86000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 125 W | 280 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6500 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s | L1 cache | 2 MB | | L2 cache | 8 MB | | L3 cache | 36 MB | 256MB | Overclocking | y | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | 100-000000312 100-100000312WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-13900KF is 43% better than EPYC 7763 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7763 has 40 more core than Core i9-13900KF. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-13900KF is better: 29
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7763 is better: 7 All the data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i9-13900KF and AMD EPYC 7763 before making a decision which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i9-13900KF Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655G • Vs Core i5-13490F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Core i7-13790F • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
AMD EPYC 7763 Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|