Processor comparisons 10-01-2022
Let's say you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i9-12900TE vs AMD EPYC 7513 tests and decide which is better for games or normal use for video editing, programming, rendering, machine learning, streaming. Here you can find useful information from several benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, PCMark 10, AIDA64, UserBenchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Geekbench 5.2, PassMark, MATLAB, VeraCrypt, Prime95, Furmark, 3DMark, Gears 5, SuperPi, Handbrake, Dolphin Emulator, 7zip, RealBench.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Rainbow Six Siege
- Valorant
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Borderlands 3
- Death Stranding
- Fortnite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fallout 76
- Overwatch
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Apex Legends
- Halo Infinite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valheim
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Last Man Standing
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7513 or Intel Core i9-12900TE.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i9-12900TE | 73% |
EPYC 7513 | 75% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7513 is 2% better than Core i9-12900TE. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i9-12900TE | 63% |
EPYC 7513 | 75% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Hitman 3, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Battlefield V, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Microsoft Flight Simulator, League of Legends (LOL), DOTA 2A, Monster Hunter World, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Forza Horizon 4, Horizon Zero Dawn, Half-Life: Alyx, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, Metro Exodus, NBA 2K20, Control, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 112.0 | 133.5 | | Valorant | 127.3 | 151.7 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 71.3 | 85.0 | | Apex Legends | 119.7 | 142.6 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 95.5 | 113.8 | | Overwatch | 103.1 | 122.9 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 87.8 | 104.7 | | DOOM Eternal | 63.7 | 75.9 | | Warzone | 99.3 | 118.4 | | Assassin's Creed | 106.9 | 127.5 | | Valheim | 105.7 | 125.9 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i9-12900TE | 174% |
EPYC 7513 | 23% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-12900TE is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7513 as it consumes less power: 35W vs. 200W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, machine learning, programming, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-12900TE |
AMD EPYC 7513 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 432 | 162 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 4547 | 6680 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 721 | 304 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 10110 | 14158 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2556 | 748 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 29091 | 36818 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-12900TE |
AMD EPYC 7513 | | Single-Core | 6663 | 1576 | | Multi-Core | 49735 | 54007 |
GeekBench 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-12900TE |
AMD EPYC 7513 | | Single-Core | 1829 | 1403 | | Multi-Core | 15550 | 29463 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i9-12900TE |
AMD EPYC 7513 | | Announcement date | July 21, 2021 | March 15, 2021 | | Type | Embedded | Server | | Socket | FCLGA1700 | SP3 | | Core name | Alder Lake | Milan | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 3 | | Generation | 12 | 3 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.8 MHz | 3.65 MHz | | Frequency | 3.6 MHz | 2.6 MHz | | Cores | 16 | 32 | | Threads | 24 | 64 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 12600 millions | 68000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 200 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | 6400 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | | | L2 cache | 14 MB | | | L3 cache | 30 MB | 128MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | | 100-000000334
100-100000334WOF
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-12900TE is 27% better than EPYC 7513 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7513 has 16 more core than Core i9-12900TE. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-12900TE is better: 17
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7513 is better: 19
The summary data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i9-12900TE and AMD EPYC 7513 before making a choice which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors
• Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Vs Core i9-12900TE
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors
• Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
• Core i9-13900K Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
|
