Processor comparisons 10-01-2022
For example you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the full tests Intel Core i9-12900TE vs AMD EPYC 7763 and decide which is better for games or normal use for rendering, programming, machine learning, streaming, video editing. Here is all information from several benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as 3DMark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender, RealBench, Gears 5, WPrime, Prime95, VeraCrypt, PCMark 10, Dolphin Emulator, UserBenchmark, Geekbench 5.2, SuperPi, PassMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), AIDA64, Blender, 7zip, Furmark, Handbrake, MATLAB.
And how good the processors are in games: - Overwatch
- Fortnite
- Apex Legends
- Fallout 76
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Last Man Standing
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Rainbow Six Siege
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valheim
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Valorant
- Halo Infinite
- Death Stranding
- Borderlands 3
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Grand Theft Auto V
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7763 or Intel Core i9-12900TE.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i9-12900TE | 77% |
EPYC 7763 | 89% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7763 is 13% better than Core i9-12900TE. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i9-12900TE | 63% |
EPYC 7763 | 68% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Forza Horizon 4, Metro Exodus, Horizon Zero Dawn, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), League of Legends (LOL), Ghostrunner, Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Hitman 3, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Monster Hunter World, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Control, NBA 2K20, DOTA 2A, Microsoft Flight Simulator.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 112.0 | 121.4 | | Valorant | 127.3 | 137.9 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 71.3 | 77.2 | | Apex Legends | 119.7 | 129.6 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 95.5 | 103.4 | | Overwatch | 103.1 | 111.7 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 87.8 | 95.2 | | DOOM Eternal | 63.7 | 69.0 | | Warzone | 99.3 | 107.6 | | Assassin's Creed | 106.9 | 115.8 | | Valheim | 105.7 | 114.5 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i9-12900TE | 174% |
EPYC 7763 | 15% |
To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-12900TE is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7763 since it has less power consumption: 35W vs. 280W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, machine learning, streaming, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-12900TE |
AMD EPYC 7763 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 432 | 210 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 4547 | 8667 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 721 | 414 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 10110 | 21470 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2556 | 970 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 29091 | 47776 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-12900TE |
AMD EPYC 7763 | | Single-Core | 6663 | 2446 | | Multi-Core | 49735 | 70081 |
GeekBench 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-12900TE |
AMD EPYC 7763 | | Single-Core | 1829 | 1303 | | Multi-Core | 15550 | 21589 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i9-12900TE |
AMD EPYC 7763 | | Announcement date | July 21, 2021 | March 15, 2021 | | Type | Embedded | Server | | Socket | FCLGA1700 | SP3 | | Core name | Alder Lake | Milan | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 3 | | Generation | 12 | 3 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.8 MHz | 3.5 MHz | | Frequency | 3.6 MHz | 2.45 MHz | | Cores | 16 | 64 | | Threads | 24 | 128 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 12600 millions | 86000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 280 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | 6400 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | | | L2 cache | 14 MB | | | L3 cache | 30 MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | | 100-000000312
100-100000312WOF
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-12900TE is 31% better than EPYC 7763 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7763 has 48 more core than Core i9-12900TE. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-12900TE is better: 17
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7763 is better: 19
However, it should be understood that the summary data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i9-12900TE and AMD EPYC 7763 before deciding which of the processors to buy for gaming.
• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors
• Core i9-13900K Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 75F3 Vs EPYC 7763
• EPYC 7713 Vs EPYC 7763
• EPYC 7663 Vs EPYC 7763
• EPYC 7543P Vs EPYC 7763
• Core i9-12900K Vs EPYC 7763
• EPYC 7643 Vs EPYC 7763
• Core i9-12900H Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
• Core i9-12900KF Vs EPYC 7763
|
