Processor comparisons 09-06-2022
Perhaps you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a decision after reading the detailed tests AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs AMD EPYC 7513 and see which is better for games or normal use for programming, streaming, rendering, video editing, machine learning. Here you can find all information from several benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as MATLAB, Handbrake, AIDA64, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Prime95, PCMark 10, RealBench, Furmark, 7zip, SuperPi, DaVinci Resolve Studio, 3DMark, Dolphin Emulator, VeraCrypt, UserBenchmark, PassMark, Gears 5, Geekbench 5.2, Blender, WPrime, Cinebench 23 (20, 15).
And how good the processors are in games: - Last Man Standing
- Grand Theft Auto V
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Death Stranding
- Apex Legends
- Fallout 76
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Overwatch
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Halo Infinite
- Valorant
- Valheim
- Borderlands 3
- Fortnite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Cyberpunk 2077
- DOOM: Eternal
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7513 or AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX | 99% |
EPYC 7513 | 75% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is 24% better than EPYC 7513. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX | 88% |
EPYC 7513 | 75% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: DOTA 2A, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Battlefield V, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Forza Horizon 4, League of Legends (LOL), Half-Life: Alyx, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Horizon Zero Dawn, NBA 2K20, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Metro Exodus, Ghostrunner, Control, Hitman 3, Monster Hunter World.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 155.4 | 133.5 | | Valorant | 176.6 | 151.7 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 98.9 | 85.0 | | Apex Legends | 166.0 | 142.6 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 132.4 | 113.8 | | Overwatch | 143.0 | 122.9 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 121.8 | 104.7 | | DOOM Eternal | 88.3 | 75.9 | | Warzone | 137.7 | 118.4 | | Assassin's Creed | 148.3 | 127.5 | | Valheim | 146.5 | 125.9 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX | 18% |
EPYC 7513 | 23% |
To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7513 is more energy efficient than the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX as it consumes less power: 280W vs. 200W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, streaming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
AMD EPYC 7513 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 257 | 162 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 13822 | 6680 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 567 | 304 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 29345 | 14158 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1472 | 748 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 87840 | 36818 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
AMD EPYC 7513 | | Single-Core | 3223 | 1576 | | Multi-Core | 106970 | 54007 |
GeekBench 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
AMD EPYC 7513 | | Single-Core | 1516 | 1403 | | Multi-Core | 43596 | 29463 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
AMD EPYC 7513 | | Announcement date | March 08, 2022 | March 15, 2021 | | Type | Desktop | Server | | Socket | sWRX8 | SP3 | | Core name | Chagall PRO | Milan | | Architecture | Zen 3 | Zen 3 | | Generation | 3 | 3 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.5 MHz | 3.65 MHz | | Frequency | 2.7 MHz | 2.6 MHz | | Cores | 64 | 32 | | Threads | 128 | 64 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 22600 millions | 68000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 280 W | 200 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | 4MB | | | L2 cache | 32MB | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 128MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | 100-000000444 | 100-000000334
100-100000334WOF
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is 3% better than EPYC 7513 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX has 32 more core than EPYC 7513. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is better: 29
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7513 is better: 3
Although it should be understood that all the data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and AMD EPYC 7513 before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
• Core i9-13900K Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
|
