Processor comparisons 09-06-2022
You may have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs AMD EPYC 7763 and understand which is better for games or simple use for video editing, machine learning, streaming, programming, rendering. Here you can find all information from real streaming and video editing tests or many benchmarks. A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like VeraCrypt, Geekbench 5.2, PCMark 10, Furmark, 7zip, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, Prime95, 3DMark, Blender, Dolphin Emulator, DaVinci Resolve Studio, SuperPi, PassMark, RealBench, Gears 5, MATLAB, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, Handbrake, AIDA64, UserBenchmark.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - Cyberpunk 2077
- Apex Legends
- Death Stranding
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fortnite
- Last Man Standing
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- DOOM: Eternal
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Borderlands 3
- Fallout 76
- Valorant
- Halo Infinite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valheim
- Overwatch
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Rainbow Six Siege
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7763 or AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX | 99% |
EPYC 7763 | 82% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is 17% better than EPYC 7763. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX | 88% |
EPYC 7763 | 68% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: NBA 2K20, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Microsoft Flight Simulator, DOTA 2A, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, League of Legends (LOL), Horizon Zero Dawn, Control, Half-Life: Alyx, Ghostrunner, Monster Hunter World, Battlefield V, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Metro Exodus, Forza Horizon 4, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Hitman 3.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 155.4 | 121.4 | | Valorant | 176.6 | 137.9 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 98.9 | 77.2 | | Apex Legends | 166.0 | 129.6 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 132.4 | 103.4 | | Overwatch | 143.0 | 111.7 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 121.8 | 95.2 | | DOOM Eternal | 88.3 | 69.0 | | Warzone | 137.7 | 107.6 | | Assassin's Creed | 148.3 | 115.8 | | Valheim | 146.5 | 114.5 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX | 18% |
EPYC 7763 | 15% |
To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7763 since it has less power consumption: 280W vs. 280W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, programming, machine learning, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
AMD EPYC 7763 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 257 | 210 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 13822 | 8667 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 567 | 414 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 29345 | 21470 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1472 | 970 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 87840 | 47776 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
AMD EPYC 7763 | | Single-Core | 3223 | 2446 | | Multi-Core | 106970 | 70081 |
GeekBench 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
AMD EPYC 7763 | | Single-Core | 1516 | 1303 | | Multi-Core | 43596 | 21589 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
AMD EPYC 7763 | | Announcement date | March 08, 2022 | March 15, 2021 | | Type | Desktop | Server | | Socket | sWRX8 | SP3 | | Core name | Chagall PRO | Milan | | Architecture | Zen 3 | Zen 3 | | Generation | 3 | 3 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.5 MHz | 3.5 MHz | | Frequency | 2.7 MHz | 2.45 MHz | | Cores | 64 | 64 | | Threads | 128 | 128 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 22600 millions | 86000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 280 W | 280 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | 4MB | | | L2 cache | 32MB | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | 100-000000444 | 100-000000312
100-100000312WOF
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is 9% better than EPYC 7763 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is better: 26
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7763 is better: 2
Although it should be realized that all the number that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the video tests and read the opinion of real owners of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and AMD EPYC 7763 before making a decision which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors
• Core i9-13900K Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 75F3 Vs EPYC 7763
• EPYC 7713 Vs EPYC 7763
• EPYC 7663 Vs EPYC 7763
• EPYC 7543P Vs EPYC 7763
• Core i9-12900K Vs EPYC 7763
• EPYC 7643 Vs EPYC 7763
• Core i9-12900H Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
• Core i9-12900KF Vs EPYC 7763
|
