|
AMD EPYC 9634 vs AMD EPYC 7663 |
|
Processor comparisons 11-03-2023 For example you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice after reading the full tests AMD EPYC 9634 vs AMD EPYC 7663 and decide which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, rendering, video editing, streaming, programming. Here you can find all information from real video editing and streaming tests or different benchmarks. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like DaVinci Resolve Studio, Prime95, 3DMark, WPrime, SuperPi, RealBench, MATLAB, AIDA64, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Dolphin Emulator, PCMark 10, Furmark, 7zip, Blender, VeraCrypt, Blender, Gears 5, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PassMark, UserBenchmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Handbrake. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Valheim
- Overwatch
- Fallout 76
- Death Stranding
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fortnite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Watch Dogs Legion
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- DOOM: Eternal
- Last Man Standing
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valorant
- Borderlands 3
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Apex Legends
- Halo Infinite
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7663 or AMD EPYC 9634.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
EPYC 9634 | 94% |
EPYC 7663 | 68% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9634 is 27% better than EPYC 7663. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 9634 | 94% |
EPYC 7663 | 76% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: DOTA 2A, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Horizon Zero Dawn, Control, Metro Exodus, NBA 2K20, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Ghostrunner, Hitman 3, League of Legends (LOL), Monster Hunter World, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Forza Horizon 4, Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 165.4 | 135.1 | Valorant | 188.0 | 153.5 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 105.3 | 86.0 | Apex Legends | 176.7 | 144.3 | Call of Duty Warzone | 141.0 | 115.1 | Overwatch | 152.3 | 124.3 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 129.7 | 105.9 | DOOM Eternal | 94.0 | 76.8 | Warzone | 146.6 | 119.7 | Assassin's Creed | 157.9 | 128.9 | Valheim | 156.0 | 127.4 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 9634 | 15% |
EPYC 7663 | 12% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 9634 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7663 as it consumes less power: 290W vs. 240W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, streaming, video rendering or video editing, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 9634 |
AMD EPYC 7663 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 445 | 184 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 17927 | 7606 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 827 | 347 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 37987 | 16121 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2016 | 852 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 98767 | 41920 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9634 |
AMD EPYC 7663 | Single-Core | 4237 | 1794 | Multi-Core | 144876 | 61492 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9634 |
AMD EPYC 7663 | Single-Core | 1331 | 874 | Multi-Core | 75930 | 46160 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 9634 |
AMD EPYC 7663 | Announcement date | November 10, 2022 | March 15, 2021 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | SP5 | SP3 | Core name | Genoa | Milan | Architecture | Zen 4 | Zen 3 | Generation | 4 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 3.5 MHz | Frequency | 2.25 MHz | 2 MHz | Cores | 84 | 56 | Threads | 168 | 112 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 116000 millions | 78000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 290 W | 240 W | Memory type | DDR5 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 460.8 | 204.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 384MB | 256MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | 100-000000797
| 100-000000318 100-100000318WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9634 is 11% better than EPYC 7663 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9634 has 28 more core than EPYC 7663. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9634 is better: 33
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7663 is better: 1 However, it should be realized that all the figures in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of AMD EPYC 9634 and AMD EPYC 7663 before making a choice which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 9634 Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7663 Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|