Processor comparisons 08-01-2022
If you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i9-12900HK vs AMD EPYC 7663 tests and understand which is better for games or simple use for streaming, programming, rendering, video editing, machine learning. Here you can find all information from real streaming and video editing tests or many benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like Handbrake, 7zip, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), SuperPi, MATLAB, Gears 5, Blender, WPrime, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, UserBenchmark, PCMark 10, 3DMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, AIDA64, Furmark, Geekbench 5.2, PassMark, Dolphin Emulator, VeraCrypt, RealBench, Prime95.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Watch Dogs Legion
- Fortnite
- Fallout 76
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Borderlands 3
- Valheim
- Valorant
- Apex Legends
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Halo Infinite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Last Man Standing
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Death Stranding
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- DOOM: Eternal
- Overwatch
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7663 or Intel Core i9-12900HK.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i9-12900HK | 75% |
EPYC 7663 | 78% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7663 is 3% better than Core i9-12900HK. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i9-12900HK | 60% |
EPYC 7663 | 90% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Monster Hunter World, NBA 2K20, Battlefield V, Horizon Zero Dawn, Ghostrunner, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Metro Exodus, League of Legends (LOL), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Forza Horizon 4, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Control, DOTA 2A, Hitman 3, Half-Life: Alyx.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 107.2 | 159.3 | | Valorant | 121.8 | 181.1 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 68.2 | 101.4 | | Apex Legends | 114.5 | 170.2 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 91.4 | 135.8 | | Overwatch | 98.7 | 146.7 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 84.1 | 124.9 | | DOOM Eternal | 60.9 | 90.5 | | Warzone | 95.0 | 141.2 | | Assassin's Creed | 102.3 | 152.1 | | Valheim | 101.1 | 150.3 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i9-12900HK | 141% |
EPYC 7663 | 12% |
To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-12900HK is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7663 as it consumes less power: 45W vs. 240W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video editing or video rendering, programming, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the CPU uses all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-12900HK |
AMD EPYC 7663 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 479 | 184 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 5047 | 7606 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 800 | 347 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 11221 | 16121 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2838 | 852 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 32291 | 41920 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-12900HK |
AMD EPYC 7663 | | Single-Core | 7395 | 1794 | | Multi-Core | 55205 | 61492 |
GeekBench 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-12900HK |
AMD EPYC 7663 | | Single-Core | 1916 | 874 | | Multi-Core | 12420 | 46160 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i9-12900HK |
AMD EPYC 7663 | | Announcement date | January 07, 2022 | March 15, 2021 | | Type | Laptop | Server | | Socket | FCBGA1744 | SP3 | | Core name | Alder Lake | Milan | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 3 | | Generation | 12 | 3 | | Turbo Frequency | 5 MHz | 3.5 MHz | | Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 2 MHz | | Cores | 14 | 56 | | Threads | 20 | 112 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 12400 millions | 78000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 240 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5 5200 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | 6400 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 108 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | | | L2 cache | 8 MB | | | L3 cache | 24 MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | | 100-000000318
100-100000318WOF
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-12900HK is 47% better than EPYC 7663 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7663 has 42 more core than Core i9-12900HK. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-12900HK is better: 15
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7663 is better: 21
All the figures in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i9-12900HK and AMD EPYC 7663 before making a selection which of the processors to buy for gaming.
• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors
• Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Core i9-12900H Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
• Core i9-12900KF Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Core i9-12900F Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Core i9-12900 Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors
• Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Vs EPYC 7663
• Core i9-13900K Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 75F3 Vs EPYC 7663
• EPYC 7713 Vs EPYC 7663
• EPYC 7543P Vs EPYC 7663
• Core i9-12900K Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Core i9-12900H Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
|
