|
AMD EPYC 7262 vs AMD EPYC 7443P |
|
Processor comparisons 19-03-2023 If you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the AMD EPYC 7262 vs AMD EPYC 7443P tests and see which is better for games or normal use for rendering, streaming, video editing, programming, machine learning. Here you can find all information from several benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as Furmark, 7zip, UserBenchmark, VeraCrypt, Prime95, SuperPi, Blender, PassMark, RealBench, 3DMark, Dolphin Emulator, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, Gears 5, PCMark 10, DaVinci Resolve Studio, GeekBench 6, 5.2, MATLAB, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Handbrake, WPrime, AIDA64. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Fortnite
- Death Stranding
- Last Man Standing
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fallout 76
- Apex Legends
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Halo Infinite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Borderlands 3
- Overwatch
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valorant
- Valheim
- Cyberpunk 2077
After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7443P or AMD EPYC 7262.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
EPYC 7262 | 56% |
EPYC 7443P | 65% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7443P is 13% better than EPYC 7262. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 7262 | 57% |
EPYC 7443P | 64% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Half-Life: Alyx, Horizon Zero Dawn, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Metro Exodus, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, NBA 2K20, Control, Monster Hunter World, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Ghostrunner, League of Legends (LOL), DOTA 2A, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Hitman 3.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 101.4 | 113.6 | Valorant | 115.2 | 129.1 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 64.5 | 72.3 | Apex Legends | 108.3 | 121.4 | Call of Duty Warzone | 86.4 | 96.8 | Overwatch | 93.3 | 104.6 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 79.5 | 89.1 | DOOM Eternal | 57.6 | 64.5 | Warzone | 89.9 | 100.7 | Assassin's Creed | 96.8 | 108.4 | Valheim | 95.6 | 107.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 7262 | 22% |
EPYC 7443P | 22% |
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, video rendering or video editing, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7262 |
AMD EPYC 7443P | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 199 | 148 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1922 | 6136 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 398 | 279 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 4212 | 13006 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1148 | 687 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 11721 | 33819 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7262 |
AMD EPYC 7443P | Single-Core | 1915 | 1545 | Multi-Core | 21190 | 49608 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7262 |
AMD EPYC 7443P | Single-Core | 1037 | 1368 | Multi-Core | 13124 | 25103 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 7262 |
AMD EPYC 7443P | Announcement date | October 01, 2019 | March 15, 2021 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | SP3 | SP3 | Core name | Rome | Milan | Architecture | Zen 2 | Zen 3 | Generation | 2 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 3.4 MHz | 4 MHz | Frequency | 3.2 MHz | 2.85 MHz | Cores | 8 | 24 | Threads | 16 | 48 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 42000 millions | 62000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 155 W | 200 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | | 204.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 128MB | 128MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | 100-000000041 100-100000041WOF | 100-000000342 100-100000342WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7262 is 10% better than EPYC 7443P in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7443P has 16 more core than EPYC 7262. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7262 is better: 6
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7443P is better: 24 Although it should be understood that the summary data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of AMD EPYC 7262 and AMD EPYC 7443P before making a selection which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 7262 Processor Comparisons • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7443P Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|