 |
AMD EPYC 7532 vs AMD EPYC 7F52 |
|
Processor comparisons 19-03-2023
For example you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a choice after reading the comprehensive tests AMD EPYC 7532 vs AMD EPYC 7F52 and understand which is better for games or simple use for programming, video editing, rendering, machine learning, streaming. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or various benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like MATLAB, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, SuperPi, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Furmark, Prime95, Gears 5, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 7zip, Blender, Dolphin Emulator, AIDA64, Handbrake, 3DMark, PassMark, UserBenchmark, WPrime, PCMark 10, DaVinci Resolve Studio, RealBench, VeraCrypt.
And how good the processors are in games: - Last Man Standing
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Overwatch
- Fortnite
- Fallout 76
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valheim
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Apex Legends
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Rainbow Six Siege
- DOOM: Eternal
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Borderlands 3
- Valorant
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Halo Infinite
- Death Stranding
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7F52 or AMD EPYC 7532.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7532 | 67% |
EPYC 7F52 | 63% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7532 is 5% better than EPYC 7F52. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7532 | 75% |
EPYC 7F52 | 64% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Ghostrunner, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Metro Exodus, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, DOTA 2A, League of Legends (LOL), Monster Hunter World, Control, Forza Horizon 4, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, NBA 2K20, Horizon Zero Dawn, Battlefield V.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 133.3 | 113.4 | | Valorant | 151.5 | 128.9 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 84.9 | 72.2 | | Apex Legends | 142.4 | 121.2 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 113.6 | 96.7 | | Overwatch | 122.7 | 104.4 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 104.6 | 88.9 | | DOOM Eternal | 75.8 | 64.4 | | Warzone | 118.2 | 100.5 | | Assassin's Creed | 127.3 | 108.3 | | Valheim | 125.8 | 107.0 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7532 | 19% |
EPYC 7F52 | 17% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7532 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7F52 since it has less power consumption: 200W vs. 240W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, programming, streaming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7532 |
AMD EPYC 7F52 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 171 | 123 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 6988 | 5347 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 415 | 236 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 14812 | 11340 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 785 | 593 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 38514 | 29500 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7532 |
AMD EPYC 7F52 | | Single-Core | 2217 | 1342 | | Multi-Core | 56494 | 43275 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7532 |
AMD EPYC 7F52 | | Single-Core | 1146 | 1253 | | Multi-Core | 44451 | 24926 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 7532 |
AMD EPYC 7F52 | | Announcement date | October 01, 2020 | April 14, 2020 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | SP3 | | Core name | Rome | Rome | | Architecture | Zen 2 | Zen 2 | | Generation | 2 | 2 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.3 MHz | 3.9 MHz | | Frequency | 2.4 MHz | 3.5 MHz | | Cores | 32 | 16 | | Threads | 64 | 32 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 64000 millions | 54000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 200 W | 240 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | 100-000000136
100-000000136WOF | 100-000000140
100-000000140WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7F52 is 31% better than EPYC 7532 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7532 has 16 more core than EPYC 7F52. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7532 is better: 25
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7F52 is better: 5
However, it should be realized that all the number in the table above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7532 and AMD EPYC 7F52 before making a decision which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 7532 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7F52 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
