 |
AMD EPYC 7473X vs AMD EPYC 7F52 |
|
Processor comparisons 29-03-2023 For example you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the AMD EPYC 7473X vs AMD EPYC 7F52 tests and see which is better for games or simple use for rendering, video editing, programming, streaming, machine learning. Here is useful information from several benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Gears 5, VeraCrypt, 7zip, WPrime, Handbrake, PCMark 10, DaVinci Resolve Studio, RealBench, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Dolphin Emulator, SuperPi, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, MATLAB, Blender, PassMark, Furmark, UserBenchmark, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Prime95, AIDA64, 3DMark. Gaming performance of processors in: - World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valorant
- Valheim
- Borderlands 3
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fortnite
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Halo Infinite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Last Man Standing
- Apex Legends
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Death Stranding
- Grand Theft Auto V
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fallout 76
- Overwatch
After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7F52 or AMD EPYC 7473X.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
EPYC 7473X | 67% |
EPYC 7F52 | 63% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7473X is 5% better than EPYC 7F52. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 7473X | 74% |
EPYC 7F52 | 64% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Metro Exodus, League of Legends (LOL), DOTA 2A, Ghostrunner, Half-Life: Alyx, Forza Horizon 4, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Monster Hunter World, Horizon Zero Dawn, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Control, NBA 2K20, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Battlefield V, Hitman 3.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 130.7 | 113.4 | Valorant | 148.5 | 128.9 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 83.2 | 72.2 | Apex Legends | 139.6 | 121.2 | Call of Duty Warzone | 111.4 | 96.7 | Overwatch | 120.3 | 104.4 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 102.5 | 88.9 | DOOM Eternal | 74.3 | 64.4 | Warzone | 115.8 | 100.5 | Assassin's Creed | 124.8 | 108.3 | Valheim | 123.3 | 107.0 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 7473X | 20% |
EPYC 7F52 | 17% | To make a final choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7473X is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7F52 as it consumes less power: 240W vs. 240W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the processor includes all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7473X |
AMD EPYC 7F52 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 170 | 123 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 7201 | 5347 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 322 | 236 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 15268 | 11340 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 804 | 593 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 39707 | 29500 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7473X |
AMD EPYC 7F52 | Single-Core | 1812 | 1342 | Multi-Core | 58245 | 43275 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7473X |
AMD EPYC 7F52 | Single-Core | 1489 | 1253 | Multi-Core | 41864 | 24926 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 7473X |
AMD EPYC 7F52 | Announcement date | March 22, 2022 | April 14, 2020 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | SP3 | SP3 | Core name | Milan | Rome | Architecture | Zen 3 | Zen 2 | Generation | 3 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 3.9 MHz | Frequency | 2.8 MHz | 3.5 MHz | Cores | 24 | 16 | Threads | 48 | 32 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 54000 millions | 54000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 240 W | 240 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | | 4096 Gb | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 768MB | 256MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | 100-000000507 100-000000507​WOF | 100-000000140 100-000000140WOF | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7F52 is 20% better than EPYC 7473X in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7473X has 8 more core than EPYC 7F52. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7473X is better: 27
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7F52 is better: 3 Although it should be understood that all the figures that you have looked at here do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7473X and AMD EPYC 7F52 before making a decision which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 7473X Processor Comparisons • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7F52 Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|