|
AMD EPYC 7F52 vs Intel Xeon Gold 6246R |
|
Processor comparisons 11-03-2023 Let's say you have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the full tests AMD EPYC 7F52 vs Intel Xeon Gold 6246R and decide which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, rendering, programming, video editing, streaming. Here is useful information from different benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like AIDA64, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Furmark, WPrime, VeraCrypt, Prime95, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 7zip, 3DMark, RealBench, MATLAB, Handbrake, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), UserBenchmark, PassMark, Gears 5, Blender, SuperPi, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, PCMark 10, Dolphin Emulator. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Death Stranding
- Borderlands 3
- Halo Infinite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fortnite
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Apex Legends
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Overwatch
- Valorant
- Valheim
- DOOM: Eternal
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fallout 76
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Last Man Standing
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Xeon Gold 6246R or AMD EPYC 7F52.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
EPYC 7F52 | 63% |
Xeon Gold 6246R | 59% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7F52 is 6% better than Xeon Gold 6246R. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 7F52 | 64% |
Xeon Gold 6246R | 62% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: NBA 2K20, Forza Horizon 4, Metro Exodus, Hitman 3, Monster Hunter World, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Microsoft Flight Simulator, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, Control, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Ghostrunner, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Horizon Zero Dawn, DOTA 2A, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 113.4 | 109.5 | Valorant | 128.9 | 124.5 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 72.2 | 69.7 | Apex Legends | 121.2 | 117.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 96.7 | 93.4 | Overwatch | 104.4 | 100.8 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 88.9 | 85.9 | DOOM Eternal | 64.4 | 62.2 | Warzone | 100.5 | 97.1 | Assassin's Creed | 108.3 | 104.6 | Valheim | 107.0 | 103.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 7F52 | 17% |
Xeon Gold 6246R | 16% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7F52 is more energy efficient than the Xeon Gold 6246R as it consumes less power: 240W vs. 205W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video editing or video rendering, programming, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the CPU uses all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7F52 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6246R | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 123 | 179 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 5347 | 5252 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 236 | 397 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 11340 | 12359 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 593 | 1059 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 29500 | 29861 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7F52 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6246R | Single-Core | 1342 | 2365 | Multi-Core | 43275 | 30393 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7F52 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6246R | Single-Core | 1253 | 1041 | Multi-Core | 24926 | 21110 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 7F52 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6246R | Announcement date | April 14, 2020 | October 01, 2020 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | SP3 | FCLGA3647 | Core name | Rome | Cascade Lake | Architecture | Zen 2 | x86 | Generation | 2 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 MHz | 4.1 MHz | Frequency | 3.5 MHz | 3.4 MHz | Cores | 16 | 16 | Threads | 32 | 32 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 54000 millions | 7510 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 240 W | 205 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4-2933 | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | 1 Gb | Memory Frequency | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 35.75 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | Yes | Part number | 100-000000140 100-000000140WOF | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7F52 is 2% better than Xeon Gold 6246R in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7F52 is better: 21
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Gold 6246R is better: 12 However, it should be understood that all the figures in the text above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7F52 and Intel Xeon Gold 6246R before making a decision which of the processors to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 7F52 Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
Intel Xeon Gold 6246R Processor Comparisons • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-12700TE • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i7-12700HE • Vs Core i5-12600HE • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13700HK • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|