 |
AMD EPYC 7262 vs AMD EPYC 7F52 |
|
Processor comparisons 19-03-2023
Let's say you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a decision after reading the comprehensive tests AMD EPYC 7262 vs AMD EPYC 7F52 and decide which is better for games or simple use for programming, video editing, streaming, machine learning, rendering. Here is useful information from several benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PassMark, MATLAB, Dolphin Emulator, PCMark 10, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Furmark, Handbrake, AIDA64, Prime95, 3DMark, Blender, WPrime, VeraCrypt, Gears 5, 7zip, SuperPi, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, UserBenchmark, RealBench, GeekBench 6, 5.2.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- DOOM: Eternal
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valorant
- Apex Legends
- Overwatch
- Borderlands 3
- Valheim
- Fortnite
- Fallout 76
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Halo Infinite
- Death Stranding
- Last Man Standing
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Red Dead Redemption 2
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7F52 or AMD EPYC 7262.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7262 | 56% |
EPYC 7F52 | 63% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7F52 is 11% better than EPYC 7262. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7262 | 57% |
EPYC 7F52 | 64% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Control, League of Legends (LOL), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20, Ghostrunner, Battlefield V, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Forza Horizon 4, DOTA 2A, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Metro Exodus, Horizon Zero Dawn, Monster Hunter World, Hitman 3, Microsoft Flight Simulator.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 101.4 | 113.4 | | Valorant | 115.2 | 128.9 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 64.5 | 72.2 | | Apex Legends | 108.3 | 121.2 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 86.4 | 96.7 | | Overwatch | 93.3 | 104.4 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 79.5 | 88.9 | | DOOM Eternal | 57.6 | 64.4 | | Warzone | 89.9 | 100.5 | | Assassin's Creed | 96.8 | 108.3 | | Valheim | 95.6 | 107.0 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7262 | 22% |
EPYC 7F52 | 17% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7262 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7F52 since it has less power consumption: 155W vs. 240W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, streaming, video rendering or video editing, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7262 |
AMD EPYC 7F52 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 199 | 123 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1922 | 5347 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 398 | 236 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 4212 | 11340 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1148 | 593 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 11721 | 29500 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7262 |
AMD EPYC 7F52 | | Single-Core | 1915 | 1342 | | Multi-Core | 21190 | 43275 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7262 |
AMD EPYC 7F52 | | Single-Core | 1037 | 1253 | | Multi-Core | 13124 | 24926 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 7262 |
AMD EPYC 7F52 | | Announcement date | October 01, 2019 | April 14, 2020 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | SP3 | | Core name | Rome | Rome | | Architecture | Zen 2 | Zen 2 | | Generation | 2 | 2 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.4 MHz | 3.9 MHz | | Frequency | 3.2 MHz | 3.5 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 16 | | Threads | 16 | 32 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 42000 millions | 54000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 155 W | 240 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 128MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | 100-000000041
100-100000041WOF | 100-000000140
100-000000140WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7F52 is 8% better than EPYC 7262 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7F52 has 8 more core than EPYC 7262. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7262 is better: 5
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7F52 is better: 26
The summary data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7262 and AMD EPYC 7F52 before making a choice which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 7262 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7F52 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
