Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
AMD EPYC 9124 vs AMD EPYC 7F52 gaming benchmark

AMD EPYC 9124 vs AMD EPYC 7F52

Processor comparisons   11-03-2023
   If you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the AMD EPYC 9124 vs AMD EPYC 7F52 tests and decide which is better for games or simple use for streaming, video editing, machine learning, programming, rendering. Here you can find all information from real video editing and streaming tests or various benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like WPrime, Blender, Dolphin Emulator, AIDA64, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Handbrake, Gears 5, RealBench, MATLAB, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 3DMark, PCMark 10, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, UserBenchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 7zip, SuperPi, VeraCrypt, Furmark, PassMark, Prime95.
   Gaming performance of processors in:
  • Fortnite
  • Borderlands 3
  • Overwatch
  • Valheim
  • DOOM: Eternal
  • Red Dead Redemption 2
  • Assassin's Creed Valhalla
  • Rainbow Six Siege
  • Valorant
  • Fallout 76
  • Cyberpunk 2077
  • Halo Infinite
  • Grand Theft Auto V
  • Last Man Standing
  • Apex Legends
  • Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
  • Watch Dogs Legion
  • World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
  • Death Stranding

   After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7F52 or AMD EPYC 9124.


 
AMD EPYC 9124
AMD EPYC 7F52

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
EPYC 912462% EPYC 7F5263%
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7F52 is 1% better than EPYC 9124. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.

Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.
EPYC 912464% EPYC 7F5264%
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Microsoft Flight Simulator, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Metro Exodus, Battlefield V, Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20, Monster Hunter World, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), League of Legends (LOL), Control, Forza Horizon 4, DOTA 2A, Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Horizon Zero Dawn, Hitman 3.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite112.7113.4
Valorant128.0128.9
Cyberpunk 207771.772.2
Apex Legends120.3121.2
Call of Duty Warzone96.096.7
Overwatch103.7104.4
Red Dead Redemption 288.388.9
DOOM Eternal64.064.4
Warzone99.9100.5
Assassin's Creed107.5108.3
Valheim106.3107.0
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.


Power consumption
EPYC 912420% EPYC 7F5217%
To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 9124 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7F52 as it consumes less power: 200W vs. 240W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.

Software benchmarks

If you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, streaming, programming, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance
AMD EPYC 9124 AMD EPYC 7F52
Cinbench 15 Single-core110123
Cinbench 15 Multi-core51785347
Cinbench 20 Single-core220236
Cinbench 20 Multi-core1099111340
Cinbench 23 Single-core566593
Cinbench 23 Multi-core2860629500

Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
AMD EPYC 9124 AMD EPYC 7F52
Single-Core12931342
Multi-Core4196843275

GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
AMD EPYC 9124 AMD EPYC 7F52
Single-Core12061253
Multi-Core2416924926

Comparison of specifications

In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!

AMD EPYC 9124 AMD EPYC 7F52
Announcement dateNovember 10, 2022April 14, 2020
TypeServerServer
SocketSP5SP3
Core nameGenoaRome
ArchitectureZen 4Zen 2
Generation42
Turbo Frequency3.7 MHz3.9 MHz
Frequency3 MHz3.5 MHz
Cores1616
Threads3232
Bus rate
Bit6464
Lithography5 nm7 nm
Transistors count64000 millions54000 millions
Power consumption (TDP)200 W240 W
Memory typeDDR5DDR4
Max. Memory4096 Gb4096 Gb
Memory Frequency48003200
Memory bandwidth204.8 GB/s204.8 GB/s
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache64MB256MB
OverclockingNoNo
Supports ECCYesNo
Part number100-000000802
100-100000802WOF
100-000000140
100-000000140WOF
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7F52 is 14% better than EPYC 9124 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).

Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9124 is better: 8
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7F52 is better: 23
   Although it should be understood that all the number in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of AMD EPYC 9124 and AMD EPYC 7F52 before deciding which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 9124 - all data

•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 6, 5.2 score
AMD EPYC 7F52 - all data

•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 6, 5.2 score


AMD EPYC 9124 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+


AMD EPYC 7F52 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands