 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6434H vs AMD EPYC 7F52 |
|
Processor comparisons 29-03-2023
Perhaps you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a choice after reading the full tests Intel Xeon Gold 6434H vs AMD EPYC 7F52 and decide which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, video editing, streaming, rendering, programming. Here you can find all information from real video editing and streaming tests or many benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as UserBenchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Furmark, Blender, Prime95, RealBench, SuperPi, Gears 5, Blender, PCMark 10, WPrime, MATLAB, AIDA64, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, VeraCrypt, Handbrake, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 3DMark, 7zip, Dolphin Emulator, PassMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15).
Gaming performance of processors in: - Grand Theft Auto V
- DOOM: Eternal
- Last Man Standing
- Valheim
- Fallout 76
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fortnite
- Valorant
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Death Stranding
- Halo Infinite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Borderlands 3
- Overwatch
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Apex Legends
- Rainbow Six Siege
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7F52 or Intel Xeon Gold 6434H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Xeon Gold 6434H | 62% |
EPYC 7F52 | 63% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7F52 is 1% better than Xeon Gold 6434H. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Xeon Gold 6434H | 64% |
EPYC 7F52 | 64% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Metro Exodus, Control, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Half-Life: Alyx, Monster Hunter World, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, League of Legends (LOL), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Forza Horizon 4, Microsoft Flight Simulator, DOTA 2A, Horizon Zero Dawn, Ghostrunner, Battlefield V, Hitman 3, NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 113.1 | 113.4 | | Valorant | 128.5 | 128.9 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 71.9 | 72.2 | | Apex Legends | 120.8 | 121.2 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 96.4 | 96.7 | | Overwatch | 104.1 | 104.4 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 88.6 | 88.9 | | DOOM Eternal | 64.2 | 64.4 | | Warzone | 100.2 | 100.5 | | Assassin's Creed | 107.9 | 108.3 | | Valheim | 106.6 | 107.0 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Xeon Gold 6434H | 27% |
EPYC 7F52 | 17% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon Gold 6434H is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7F52 as it consumes less power: 195W vs. 240W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, video rendering or video editing, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon Gold 6434H |
AMD EPYC 7F52 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 886 | 123 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2879 | 5347 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 1976 | 236 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 7114 | 11340 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1374 | 593 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 40535 | 29500 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Gold 6434H |
AMD EPYC 7F52 | | Single-Core | 12581 | 1342 | | Multi-Core | 41263 | 43275 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Gold 6434H |
AMD EPYC 7F52 | | Single-Core | 1615 | 1253 | | Multi-Core | 24562 | 24926 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Xeon Gold 6434H |
AMD EPYC 7F52 | | Announcement date | March 11, 2023 | April 14, 2020 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | FCLGA4677 | SP3 | | Core name | Sapphire Rapids | Rome | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 2 | | Generation | 4 | 2 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.1 MHz | 3.9 MHz | | Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 3.5 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 16 | | Threads | 16 | 32 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 36000 millions | 54000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 195 W | 240 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s 1DPC Up to DDR5 4400 MT/s 2DPC | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 22.5 MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | No | | Part number | | 100-000000140
100-000000140WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon Gold 6434H is 5% better than EPYC 7F52 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7F52 has 8 more core than Xeon Gold 6434H. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Gold 6434H is better: 13
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7F52 is better: 21
However, it should be realized that all the number in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Xeon Gold 6434H and AMD EPYC 7F52 before making a decision which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Xeon Gold 6434H Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7F52 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
