 |
Helio X27 (MT6797X) vs Snapdragon 665 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which chip or processor is better? Detailed compare data of benchmarks MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, speed testing of GPUs Mali-T880 MP4 and Adreno 610. This performance comparison includes two processors: Helio X27 (MT6797X) is deca-core (ARM Cortex-A72) and Snapdragon 665 is octa-core (Kryo 260). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics of the chips, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests such as Vellamo, Neocore, PassMark, PCMark, WebXPRT 3, Mozilla Kraken, Octane V2, Quadrant, 3DMark, Geekbench, AnTuTu, GFXBench, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Mortal Kombat, PUBG, Call of Duty: Mobile, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Minecraft Bedrock, Fortnite etc. After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy Helio X27 (MT6797X) or Snapdragon 665 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreHelio X27 (MT6797X) | 7% |
Snapdragon 665 | 11% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Helio X27 (MT6797X) | 41% |
Snapdragon 665 | 66% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingHelio X27 (MT6797X) | 4% |
Snapdragon 665 | 8% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Helio X27 (MT6797X) |
Snapdragon 665 | Total score | 98106 | 153366 | CPU | 27468 | 42942 | GPU | 37277 | 58273 | MEM | 15689 | 24532 | UX | 17655 | 27605 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Helio X27 (MT6797X) |
Snapdragon 665 | Single-Core | 253 | 314 | Multi-Core | 1142 | 1320 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Helio X27 (MT6797X) |
Snapdragon 665 | Frequency | 2600 MHz | 2000 MHz | Cores | 10 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 20 nm | 11 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 2x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A72 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | 8x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR3 (Dual Channel) | LPDDR4x (Dual Channel) | Max. Memory | 4 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 800 | 1866 | Memory bandwidth | 14 | 14.9 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 32 KB | | L2 cache | 1 MB | | L3 cache | 1 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Helio X27 (MT6797X) is 23% better than Snapdragon 665 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Helio X27 (MT6797X) has -2 more core than Snapdragon 665. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-T880 MP4 | Adreno 610 | GPU Frequency | 875 MHz | 750 MHz | GFloPS | 118.91 | 312 | # of Cores | 4 | | # of Shader Units | | 192 | Display | 2560 x 1600 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | 29.9 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 21.8 | 28.2 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 37.8 | 55.5 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 24.3 | 30.8 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 18.6 | 23.9 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 23.4 | 39.6 | Real Racing 3 | 75.6 | 83.3 | Sniper 3D | 60.5 | 122.1 | Need for Speed No Limits | 68 | 99.9 | Mortal Kombat X | 60.5 | 88.8 | CSR Racing 2 | 52.9 | 66.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 32 MP | 24 MP | Dual Camera resolution | | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Qualcomm Spectra 165 | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265 | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | | Qualcomm Snapdragon X12 LTE modem | Download speed | 300 MBit/s. | 600 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GLONASS, GPS, Galileo, SBAS, QZSS, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) is better: 11
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 is better: 28 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs Helio X27 (MT6797X) and Snapdragon 665, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Helio X27 (MT6797X) SoC Comparisons • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Helio G35 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Kirin 710A • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Snapdragon 460 • Vs Exynos 9609 • Vs Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Helio P70 • Vs Snapdragon 670 • Vs Exynos 9611 • Vs Exynos 9610 • Vs Kirin 970 • Vs Helio P60 • Vs Helio P90 • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs SC9863A • Vs Snapdragon 630 • Vs Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB • Vs Rockchip RK3562
Snapdragon 665 SoC Comparisons • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Rockchip RK3562
| |
|