Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X)

Comparisons 11-03-2021

Well, which processor or chip is better? Full data of benchmarks and speed tests Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X), compare of GPUs Mali-T880 MP4 and Adreno 510.

This performance comparison includes two processors: Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A72) and Helio X27 (MT6797X) is deca-core (ARM Cortex-A72). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful review of all the specifications of the CPUs, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.

From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special testing software like AnTuTu, Vellamo, PCMark, 3DMark, Quadrant, PassMark, Mozilla Kraken, Neocore, GFXBench, WebXPRT 3, Geekbench, Octane V2, even the gaming performance of chips in Mortal Kombat, Sniper 3D, PUBG, Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock, Fortnite, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Call of Duty: Mobile etc.

After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 or Helio X27 (MT6797X) and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, CSR Racing 2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Snapdragon 652 MSM8976

Helio X27 (MT6797X)

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Snapdragon 652 MSM8976

25%

Helio X27 (MT6797X)

41%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Snapdragon 652 MSM8976

Helio X27 (MT6797X)

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Snapdragon 652 MSM8976	Helio X27 (MT6797X)
Total score	82688	98106
CPU	23162	27468
GPU	31412	37277
MEM	13222	15689
UX	14875	17655

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Snapdragon 652 MSM8976	Helio X27 (MT6797X)
Single-Core	214	253
Multi-Core	963	1142

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Snapdragon 652 MSM8976	Helio X27 (MT6797X)
Frequency	1800 MHz	2600 MHz
Cores	8	10
Bit	64	64
Lithography	28 nm	20 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A72 4x1.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	2x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A72 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)		5 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x (Dual Channel)	LPDDR3 (Dual Channel)
Max. Memory	4 Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	1866	800
Memory bandwidth	14.9	14
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	256 KB	32 KB
L2 cache		1 MB
L3 cache		1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Helio X27 (MT6797X) is 30% better than Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 has 2 more core than Helio X27 (MT6797X). Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Adreno 510	Mali-T880 MP4
GPU Frequency	600 MHz	875 MHz
GFloPS	176	118.91
# of Cores		4
# of Shader Units	128
Display	2560 x 1600 pixels	2560 x 1600 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	15.7	21.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	28.6	37.8
Call of Duty: Mobile	16.2	24.3
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	12.6	18.6
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	15.6	23.4
Real Racing 3	42.9	75.6
Sniper 3D	62.9	60.5
Need for Speed No Limits	40	68
Mortal Kombat X	45.8	60.5
CSR Racing 2	34.3	52.9

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	21 MP	32 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC	H.264, H.265

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Qualcomm Snapdragon X8 LTE modem
Download speed	300 MBit/s.	300 MBit/s.
Upload speed	100 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 is better: 9
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) is better: 25
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 and Helio X27 (MT6797X), as well as read the test results at the links below.

Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 specs and review.

Helio X27 (MT6797X) SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Helio X27 (MT6797X) specs and review.