MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) vs HiSilicon Kirin 955 benchmark which processor is better

Helio X27 (MT6797X) vs Kirin 955

Comparisons 11-03-2021

So, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive compare data of benchmarks MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) vs HiSilicon Kirin 955, speed testing of GPUs Mali-T880 MP4 and Mali-T880 MP4.

This performance comparison involves two processors: Helio X27 (MT6797X) is deca-core (ARM Cortex-A72) and Kirin 955 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A72). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table.

From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests like GFXBench, Octane V2, PCMark, Mozilla Kraken, 3DMark, WebXPRT 3, Geekbench, Neocore, Vellamo, AnTuTu 8, PassMark, Quadrant, and how good the SoCs are in games Minecraft Bedrock, Call of Duty: Mobile, Mortal Kombat, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Fortnite, PUBG, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3 etc.

After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy Helio X27 (MT6797X) or Kirin 955 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, Asphalt 9.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Helio X27 (MT6797X)

Kirin 955

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Helio X27 (MT6797X)

41%

Kirin 955

49%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Helio X27 (MT6797X)

Kirin 955

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Helio X27 (MT6797X)	Kirin 955
Total score	98106	102680
CPU	27468	28750
GPU	37277	39011
MEM	15689	16436
UX	17655	18491

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Helio X27 (MT6797X)	Kirin 955
Single-Core	253	271
Multi-Core	1142	924

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Helio X27 (MT6797X)	Kirin 955
Frequency	2600 MHz	2500 MHz
Cores	10	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	20 nm	16 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	2x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A72 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A72 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	5 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR3 (Dual Channel)	LPDDR4x
Max. Memory	4 Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	800	1600
Memory bandwidth	14	25.6
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Helio X27 (MT6797X) is 3% better than Kirin 955 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Helio X27 (MT6797X) has -2 more core than Kirin 955. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-T880 MP4	Mali-T880 MP4
GPU Frequency	875 MHz	900 MHz
GFloPS	118.91	122.31
# of Cores	4	4
# of Shader Units
Display	2560 x 1600 pixels	2560 x 1600 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	21.8	23.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	37.8	39.4
Call of Duty: Mobile	24.3	26.6
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	18.6	19.9
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	23.4	25.8
Real Racing 3	75.6	69
Sniper 3D	60.5	51.2
Need for Speed No Limits	68	63
Mortal Kombat X	60.5	63
CSR Racing 2	52.9	47.3

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	32 MP	20 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Download speed	300 MBit/s.	300 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) is better: 12
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 955 is better: 18
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs Helio X27 (MT6797X) and Kirin 955, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Helio X27 (MT6797X) SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Helio X27 (MT6797X) specs and review.

Kirin 955 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Kirin 955 specs and review.