MediaTek MT8312CW vs MediaTek MT6570

Comparisons 11-03-2021

Well, which processor or chip is better? Full comparison data of benchmarks MediaTek MT8312CW vs MediaTek MT6570, speed testing of GPUs Mali-400 and Mali-400 MP2.

This performance comparison involves two processors: MT8312CW is dual-core (ARM Cortex-A7) and MT6570 is dual-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table.

From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special test applications such as AnTuTu 8, GFXBench, Vellamo, 3DMark, WebXPRT 3, PCMark, Octane V2, GeekBench 6, 5, PassMark, Quadrant, Neocore, Mozilla Kraken, and how good the CPUs are in games Minecraft Bedrock, Mortal Kombat, Fortnite, Sniper 3D, Call of Duty: Mobile, Real Racing 3, PUBG, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra etc.

After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy MT8312CW or MT6570 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, CSR Racing 2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT8312CW

MT6570

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT8312CW

24%

MT6570

26%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT8312CW

MT6570

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT8312CW	MT6570
Total score	12158	12348
CPU	3404	3448
GPU	4628	4692
MEM	1945	1983
UX	2178	2214

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT8312CW	MT6570
Single-Core	32	32
Multi-Core	148	150

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT8312CW	MT6570
Frequency	1200 MHz	1200 MHz
Cores	2	2
Bit	32	32
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	2x1.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A7	2x1.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR2	LPDDR2
Max. Memory	2 Gb	1 Gb
Memory Frequency	433	266
Memory bandwidth	4	4
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-400	Mali-400 MP2
GPU Frequency	400 MHz	400 MHz
GFloPS	3.6	8.4
# of Cores	1	2
# of Shader Units
Display	1280 x 720 pixels	960 x 540 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	1.1	3.8
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	8.4	10.3
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	4.4	6.5
Call of Duty: Mobile	3.3	5.7
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	5.8	7.1
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	10.1	12.3
Real Racing 3	7.7	9.8
Sniper 3D	8.4	14.3
Need for Speed No Limits	6.2	11.7
Mortal Kombat X	5.7	7.5
CSR Racing 2	5.3	9.1

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly.
Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	5 MP	5 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	HD	HD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Upload speed
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8312CW is better: 5
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6570 is better: 19
You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs MT8312CW and MT6570, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MT8312CW SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MT8312CW specs and review.

MT6570 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MT6570 specs and review.