MediaTek MT8312CW vs MediaTek MT6735M

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which chip or processor is better? Comprehensive data of benchmarks and speed tests MediaTek MT8312CW vs MediaTek MT6735M, comparison of GPUs Mali-400 and Mali-T720.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: MT8312CW is dual-core (ARM Cortex-A7) and MT6735M is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics of the CPUs, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in synthetic type tests like Vellamo, Mozilla Kraken, GFXBench, PCMark, AnTuTu, Neocore, Geekbench, Octane V2, PassMark, WebXPRT 3, Quadrant, 3DMark, and how good the chips are in games Fortnite, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Sniper 3D, Mortal Kombat, PUBG, Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock, Call of Duty: Mobile etc.
   After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which chip is better to buy MT8312CW or MT6735M and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9, Madout2, CSR Racing 2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT8312CW

MT6735M

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT8312CW

24%

MT6735M

24%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT8312CW

MT6735M

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT8312CW	MT6735M
Total score	12158	20157
CPU	3404	5642
GPU	4628	7668
MEM	1945	3232
UX	2178	3622

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT8312CW	MT6735M
Single-Core	32	53
Multi-Core	148	246

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT8312CW	MT6735M
Frequency	1200 MHz	1000 MHz
Cores	2	4
Bit	32	64
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	2x1.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A7	4x1.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR2	LPDDR3 (Single Channel)
Max. Memory	2 Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	433	667
Memory bandwidth	4	4
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT8312CW is 16% better than MT6735M in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that MT8312CW has 2 more core than MT6735M. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-400	Mali-T720
GPU Frequency	400 MHz	450 MHz
GFloPS	3.6	7.65
# of Cores	1	1
# of Shader Units
Display	1280 x 720 pixels	1280 x 720 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	1.1	4.1
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	8.4	15.4
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	4.4	9.2
Call of Duty: Mobile	3.3	7.7
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	5.8	11.4
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	10.1	19.1
Real Racing 3	7.7	18.4
Sniper 3D	8.4	20.2
Need for Speed No Limits	6.2	12.9
Mortal Kombat X	5.7	12
CSR Racing 2	5.3	10.1

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly.
Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	5 MP	13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	HD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Upload speed		50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8312CW is better: 2
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6735M is better: 28
You need to know that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs MT8312CW and MT6735M, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MT8312CW SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MT8312CW specs and review.

MT6735M SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MT6735M specs and review.