MediaTek MT8312CW vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212

Comparisons 11-03-2021

So, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive compare data of benchmarks MediaTek MT8312CW vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212, speed testing of GPUs Mali-400 and Adreno 302.

This performance comparison includes two processors: MT8312CW is dual-core (ARM Cortex-A7) and Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table.

From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special test applications like AnTuTu, WebXPRT 3, PassMark, Neocore, GFXBench, 3DMark, PCMark, Vellamo, Mozilla Kraken, Quadrant, Octane V2, Geekbench, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Minecraft Bedrock, Real Racing 3, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, PUBG, Fortnite, Call of Duty: Mobile, Mortal Kombat, Sniper 3D etc.

After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processors is better to buy MT8312CW or Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, Asphalt 9.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT8312CW

Snapdragon 200 MSM8212

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT8312CW

24%

Snapdragon 200 MSM8212

22%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT8312CW

Snapdragon 200 MSM8212

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT8312CW	Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
Total score	12158	14552
CPU	3404	4066
GPU	4628	5528
MEM	1945	2333
UX	2178	2628

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT8312CW	Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
Single-Core	32	38
Multi-Core	148	177

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT8312CW	Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
Frequency	1200 MHz	1200 MHz
Cores	2	4
Bit	32	32
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	2x1.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A7	4x1.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	4 W
Memory type	LPDDR2	LPDDR 2
Max. Memory	2 Gb	1 Gb
Memory Frequency	433	333
Memory bandwidth	4	6
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	128 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	2 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Another difference is that MT8312CW has 2 more core than Snapdragon 200 MSM8212. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-400	Adreno 302
GPU Frequency	400 MHz	400 MHz
GFloPS	3.6	19.2
# of Cores	1
# of Shader Units		24
Display	1280 x 720 pixels	960 x 540 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	1.1	3.4
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	8.4	10.6
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	4.4	6.5
Call of Duty: Mobile	3.3	5.8
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	5.8	8.5
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	10.1	13.4
Real Racing 3	7.7	9.8
Sniper 3D	8.4	10.4
Need for Speed No Limits	6.2	9.1
Mortal Kombat X	5.7	9.4
CSR Racing 2	5.3	7.8

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly.
Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	5 MP	8 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	HD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Upload speed		50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8312CW is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 is better: 27
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors MT8312CW and Snapdragon 200 MSM8212, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MT8312CW SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MT8312CW specs and review.

Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 specs and review.