Intel Atom Z2520 vs MediaTek MT6570

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which processor or chip is better? Full data of benchmarks and speed tests Intel Atom Z2520 vs MediaTek MT6570, comparison of GPUs Mali-400 MP2 and PowerVR SGX544.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: Atom Z2520 is dual-core (Cloverview) and MT6570 is dual-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special testing software such as Quadrant, Mozilla Kraken, AnTuTu 8, PassMark, WebXPRT 3, Octane V2, Neocore, PCMark, 3DMark, GFXBench, Vellamo, Geekbench, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Call of Duty: Mobile, Real Racing 3, PUBG, Minecraft Bedrock, Fortnite, Sniper 3D, Mortal Kombat etc.
   After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy Atom Z2520 or MT6570 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9, Madout2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Atom Z2520

MT6570

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Atom Z2520

14%

MT6570

26%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Atom Z2520

MT6570

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Atom Z2520	MT6570
Total score	11918	12348
CPU	3335	3448
GPU	4536	4692
MEM	1906	1983
UX	2154	2214

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Atom Z2520	MT6570
Single-Core	31	32
Multi-Core	145	150

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Atom Z2520	MT6570
Frequency	1200 MHz	1200 MHz
Cores	2	2
Bit	64	32
Lithography	32 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	2x1.2 GHz Cloverview	2x1.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR2	LPDDR2
Max. Memory	2 Gb	1 Gb
Memory Frequency	1066	266
Memory bandwidth	4	4
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	128 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	2 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	8 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	PowerVR SGX544	Mali-400 MP2
GPU Frequency	533 MHz	400 MHz
GFloPS	17.06	8.4
# of Cores	1	2
# of Shader Units
Display	1280 x 800 pixels	960 x 540 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	3.2	3.8
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	9.8	10.3
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	5.3	6.5
Call of Duty: Mobile	5.9	5.7
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	7.7	7.1
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	11.5	12.3
Real Racing 3	9.3	9.8
Sniper 3D	10.1	14.3
Need for Speed No Limits	9.5	11.7
Mortal Kombat X	6.9	7.5
CSR Racing 2	6.9	9.1

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly.
Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	8 MP	5 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	HD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Intel XMM 7160
Upload speed	6 MBit/s.
Navigation		GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Atom Z2520 is better: 15
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6570 is better: 19
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs Atom Z2520 and MT6570, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Atom Z2520 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Atom Z2520 specs and review.

MT6570 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MT6570 specs and review.