MediaTek MT6570 vs MediaTek MT6735M

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which chip or processor is better? Full compare data of benchmarks MediaTek MT6570 vs MediaTek MT6735M, speed examination of GPUs Mali-T720 and Mali-400 MP2.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: MT6570 is dual-core (ARM Cortex-A7) and MT6735M is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests like GeekBench 6, 5, Octane V2, Neocore, 3DMark, Vellamo, PCMark, PassMark, Quadrant, AnTuTu 8, GFXBench, WebXPRT 3, Mozilla Kraken, and how good the CPUs are in games Mortal Kombat, Real Racing 3, PUBG, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Fortnite, Call of Duty: Mobile, Minecraft Bedrock, Sniper 3D etc.
   After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy MT6570 or MT6735M and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT6570

MT6735M

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT6570

26%

MT6735M

24%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT6570

MT6735M

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT6570	MT6735M
Total score	12348	20157
CPU	3448	5642
GPU	4692	7668
MEM	1983	3232
UX	2214	3622

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT6570	MT6735M
Single-Core	32	53
Multi-Core	150	246

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT6570	MT6735M
Frequency	1200 MHz	1000 MHz
Cores	2	4
Bit	32	64
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	2x1.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A7	4x1.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR2	LPDDR3 (Single Channel)
Max. Memory	1 Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	266	667
Memory bandwidth	4	4
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT6570 is 16% better than MT6735M in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that MT6570 has 2 more core than MT6735M. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-400 MP2	Mali-T720
GPU Frequency	400 MHz	450 MHz
GFloPS	8.4	7.65
# of Cores	2	1
# of Shader Units
Display	960 x 540 pixels	1280 x 720 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	3.8	4.1
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	10.3	15.4
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	6.5	9.2
Call of Duty: Mobile	5.7	7.7
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	7.1	11.4
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	12.3	19.1
Real Racing 3	9.8	18.4
Sniper 3D	14.3	20.2
Need for Speed No Limits	11.7	12.9
Mortal Kombat X	7.5	12
CSR Racing 2	9.1	10.1

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly.
Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	5 MP	13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	HD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Upload speed		50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6570 is better: 4
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6735M is better: 29
You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs MT6570 and MT6735M, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MT6570 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MT6570 specs and review.

MT6735M SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MT6735M specs and review.