|
Intel Atom x3-C3200RK vs Spreadtrum SC9832 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which chip or processor is better? Detailed compare data of benchmarks Intel Atom x3-C3200RK vs Spreadtrum SC9832, speed examination of GPUs Mali-450 MP4 and Mali-400 MP2. This performance comparison involves two processors: Atom x3-C3200RK is quad-core () and Spreadtrum SC9832 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the CPUs, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special testing software like AnTuTu, 3DMark, PassMark, Octane V2, GFXBench, PCMark, WebXPRT 3, Quadrant, Mozilla Kraken, GeekBench 6, 5, Vellamo, Neocore, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Fortnite, Mortal Kombat, Minecraft Bedrock, Call of Duty: Mobile, Real Racing 3, PUBG, Sniper 3D etc. After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which SoCs is better to buy Atom x3-C3200RK or Spreadtrum SC9832 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, Asphalt 9.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreAtom x3-C3200RK | 1% |
Spreadtrum SC9832 | 1% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Atom x3-C3200RK | 26% |
Spreadtrum SC9832 | 30% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingAtom x3-C3200RK | 1% |
Spreadtrum SC9832 | 1% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Atom x3-C3200RK |
Spreadtrum SC9832 | Total score | 19384 | 22092 | CPU | 5426 | 6178 | GPU | 7356 | 8392 | MEM | 3101 | 3534 | UX | 3489 | 3986 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Atom x3-C3200RK |
Spreadtrum SC9832 | Single-Core | 51 | 58 | Multi-Core | 236 | 270 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Atom x3-C3200RK |
Spreadtrum SC9832 | Frequency | 1100 MHz | 1300 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Bit | 64 | 32 | Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x1.1 GHz | 4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7 | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 7 W | Memory type | LPDDR2/3 | LPDDR2 | Max. Memory | 2 Gb | 1 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1333 | 266 | Memory bandwidth | 4 | 4 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB | L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Spreadtrum SC9832 is 15% better than Atom x3-C3200RK in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-450 MP4 | Mali-400 MP2 | GPU Frequency | 600 MHz | 400 MHz | GFloPS | 35.77 | 8.4 | # of Cores | 4 | 2 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 1920 x 1080 pixels | 1280 x 800 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 6.9 | 3.7 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 16.4 | 15.3 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 10.5 | 9.5 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 9.1 | 8.9 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 13.6 | 12.3 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 20.5 | 20.1 | Real Racing 3 | 15.8 | 19 | Sniper 3D | 16.8 | 15.2 | Need for Speed No Limits | 14.7 | 13.3 | Mortal Kombat X | 13.7 | 15.2 | CSR Racing 2 | 14.7 | 11.4 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 13 MP | 13 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264 |
Networks and NavigationModem | | | Upload speed | 6 MBit/s. | | Navigation | | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Atom x3-C3200RK is better: 21
The number of parameters for which Spreadtrum SC9832 is better: 10 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs Atom x3-C3200RK and Spreadtrum SC9832, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Atom x3-C3200RK SoC Comparisons • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs MediaTek MT6737H • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs MediaTek MT8167D • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 • Vs Atom x3-C3130 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 • Vs MediaTek MT6589 • Vs MediaTek MT6572 • Vs MediaTek MT6572A • Vs MediaTek MT6570 • Vs MediaTek MT8312 • Vs MediaTek MT8312CW • Vs Atom Z2520 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A • Vs MediaTek MT6572M • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830 • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 • Vs MediaTek MT6735T • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs MediaTek MT8735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC5735 • Vs MediaTek MT6575
Spreadtrum SC9832 SoC Comparisons • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs MediaTek MT8127 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs MediaTek MT6570 • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs MediaTek MT8312 • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs MediaTek MT6732M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs MediaTek MT6572 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT6572M • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs MediaTek MT8765B • Vs Atom x3-C3130 • Vs MediaTek MT6589 • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 • Vs MediaTek MT8312CW • Vs Atom Z2520 • Vs MediaTek MT6737H • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs MediaTek MT8167D • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs MediaTek MT6753T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 • Vs MediaTek MT6735T • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs MediaTek MT8735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC5735 • Vs MediaTek MT8167A • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E
| |
|