|
Intel Atom x3-C3200RK vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive data of speed tests and benchmarks Intel Atom x3-C3200RK vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215, compare of GPUs Mali-450 MP4 and Adreno 308. This performance comparison involves two processors: Atom x3-C3200RK is quad-core () and Snapdragon 215 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics of the CPUs, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special test applications such as Vellamo, AnTuTu 8, GFXBench, PassMark, WebXPRT 3, Mozilla Kraken, GeekBench 6, 5, Octane V2, Neocore, Quadrant, PCMark, 3DMark, and how good the CPUs are in games Call of Duty: Mobile, Real Racing 3, Sniper 3D, PUBG, Minecraft Bedrock, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Fortnite, Mortal Kombat etc. After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy Atom x3-C3200RK or Snapdragon 215 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreAtom x3-C3200RK | 1% |
Snapdragon 215 | 1% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Atom x3-C3200RK | 26% |
Snapdragon 215 | 34% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingAtom x3-C3200RK | 1% |
Snapdragon 215 | 1% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Atom x3-C3200RK |
Snapdragon 215 | Total score | 19384 | 24681 | CPU | 5426 | 6910 | GPU | 7356 | 9383 | MEM | 3101 | 3943 | UX | 3489 | 4442 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Atom x3-C3200RK |
Snapdragon 215 | Single-Core | 51 | 38 | Multi-Core | 236 | 134 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Atom x3-C3200RK |
Snapdragon 215 | Frequency | 1100 MHz | 1300 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x1.1 GHz | 4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 7 W | Memory type | LPDDR2/3 | LPDDR 3 | Max. Memory | 2 Gb | 4 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1333 | 533 | Memory bandwidth | 4 | 4 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB | L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 215 is 15% better than Atom x3-C3200RK in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-450 MP4 | Adreno 308 | GPU Frequency | 600 MHz | 500 MHz | GFloPS | 35.77 | 27 | # of Cores | 4 | | # of Shader Units | | 24 | Display | 1920 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 6.9 | 4.3 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 16.4 | 17.6 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 10.5 | 9.3 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 9.1 | 9.9 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 13.6 | 13.5 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 20.5 | 22.2 | Real Racing 3 | 15.8 | 14 | Sniper 3D | 16.8 | 17.7 | Need for Speed No Limits | 14.7 | 11.2 | Mortal Kombat X | 13.7 | 10.7 | CSR Racing 2 | 14.7 | 13 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 13 MP | 13 MP | Dual Camera resolution | | 8 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | 2x Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | | Qualcomm Snapdragon X5 LTE modem | Download speed | 21 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 6 MBit/s. | 50 MBit/s. | Navigation | | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | Yes | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Atom x3-C3200RK is better: 17
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 is better: 16 You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets Atom x3-C3200RK and Snapdragon 215, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Atom x3-C3200RK SoC Comparisons • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs MediaTek MT6737H • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs MediaTek MT8167D • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 • Vs Atom x3-C3130 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 • Vs MediaTek MT6589 • Vs MediaTek MT6572 • Vs MediaTek MT6572A • Vs MediaTek MT6570 • Vs MediaTek MT8312 • Vs MediaTek MT8312CW • Vs Atom Z2520 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A • Vs MediaTek MT6572M • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830 • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 • Vs MediaTek MT6735T • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs MediaTek MT8735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC5735 • Vs MediaTek MT6575
Snapdragon 215 SoC Comparisons • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs MediaTek MT8127 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs MediaTek MT6570 • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs MediaTek MT6732M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs MediaTek MT6572 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs MediaTek MT8765B • Vs Atom x3-C3130 • Vs MediaTek MT6589 • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs MediaTek MT6737H • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs MediaTek MT8167D • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs MediaTek MT6732 • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs MediaTek MT6753T • Vs MediaTek MT6735T • Vs MediaTek MT8735P • Vs Unisoc SC7331e • Vs MediaTek MT8167A • Vs MediaTek MT6731 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S
| |
|