|
MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive data of speed tests and benchmarks MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430, comparison of GPUs Mali-T628 MP6 and Mali-T860 MP2. This performance comparison involves two processors: Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Exynos 5 Octa 5430 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A15). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics of the CPUs, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special testing software like 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5, Octane V2, Vellamo, WebXPRT 3, Neocore, PCMark, AnTuTu, Mozilla Kraken, PassMark, Quadrant, GFXBench, even the gaming performance of processors in Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, PUBG, Fortnite, Mortal Kombat, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Call of Duty: Mobile, Minecraft Bedrock etc. After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which chipset is better to buy Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) or Exynos 5 Octa 5430 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreHelio P15 (MT6755 Pro) | 3% |
Exynos 5 Octa 5430 | 4% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) | 26% |
Exynos 5 Octa 5430 | 36% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingHelio P15 (MT6755 Pro) | 2% |
Exynos 5 Octa 5430 | 2% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) |
Exynos 5 Octa 5430 | Total score | 54931 | 56436 | CPU | 15371 | 15801 | GPU | 20866 | 21452 | MEM | 8786 | 9024 | UX | 9887 | 10151 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) |
Exynos 5 Octa 5430 | Single-Core | 142 | 146 | Multi-Core | 639 | 657 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) |
Exynos 5 Octa 5430 | Frequency | 2200 MHz | 2000 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 28 nm | 20 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.2GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A15 4x1.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A7 | Power consumption (TDP) | 4 W | 3 W | Memory type | LPDDR3 (Single Channel) | LPDDR3 | Max. Memory | 4 Gb | 4 Gb | Memory Frequency | 933 | 1650 | Memory bandwidth | 13 | 14 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 32 KB | 384 KB | L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB | L3 cache | 1 MB | 4 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) is 9% better than Exynos 5 Octa 5430 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-T860 MP2 | Mali-T628 MP6 | GPU Frequency | 800 MHz | 680 MHz | GFloPS | 54.31 | 176 | # of Cores | 2 | 6 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 1920 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 18.6 | 18.4 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 46.5 | 47.6 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 32.2 | 32.3 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 28.9 | 28.3 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 38.2 | 39.5 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 58.7 | 59.9 | Real Racing 3 | 56.4 | 40.4 | Sniper 3D | 41.9 | 51.7 | Need for Speed No Limits | 38.6 | 51.7 | Mortal Kombat X | 37 | 51.7 | CSR Racing 2 | 35.4 | 38.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 21 MP | 16 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 16 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 120 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP8 |
Networks and NavigationModem | | | Download speed | 300 MBit/s. | 42 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 11 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) is better: 11
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 is better: 27 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint comparison and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) and Exynos 5 Octa 5430, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs MediaTek MT6738 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S
Exynos 5 Octa 5430 SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
| |
|