 |
PowerVR GX6250 at 650 MHz vs Mali-G72 MP3 at 700 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 11-01-2021
Detailed compare data of PowerVR GX6250 @ 650MHz vs Mali-G72 MP3 @ 700MHz which GPU is better. Extreme benchmark testing of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like GFXBench, AnTuTu v10, 9, PCMark, Neocore, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Quadrant, Vellamo, 3DMark, PassMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in PUBG, Fortnite, Call of Duty, Minecraft, GTA, Madout2, Asphalt 9 etc.
After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy PowerVR GX6250 or Mali-G72 MP3.
PowerVR GX6250 @ 650MHz vs Mali-G72 MP3 @ 700MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | PowerVR GX6250 @ 650MHz |
Mali-G72 MP3 @ 700MHz |
| Frequency | 650 MHz | 700 MHz | | Cores | 2 | 3 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 28 nm | 12 nm | | Antutu v10 | 79647 | 122084 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 4409 | 4788 | | | | | GFloPS | 83.2 GFloPS | 161 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 266 MT/s | 102 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 2.6 GP/s | 3.15 GP/s | | DirectX | 10 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which PowerVR GX6250 @ 650MHz is better: 1
The number of parameters for which Mali-G72 MP3 @ 700MHz is better: 8
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch full video of parallel comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
