Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 vs Unisoc SC9863A benchmark which processor is better

Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 vs Unisoc SC9863A

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which processor or chip is better? Detailed data of benchmarks and speed tests Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 vs Unisoc SC9863A, comparison of GPUs Mali-T880 MP12 and IMG8322.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: Exynos 8 Octa 8890 is octa-core (Exynos Mongoose) and SC9863A is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A55). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special test applications such as PCMark, Octane V2, WebXPRT 3, Mozilla Kraken, Neocore, 3DMark, PassMark, Quadrant, AnTuTu, Geekbench, GFXBench, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of chips in Real Racing 3, Fortnite, PUBG, Sniper 3D, Call of Duty: Mobile, Minecraft Bedrock, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Mortal Kombat etc.
   After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which chipset is better to buy Exynos 8 Octa 8890 or SC9863A and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9.

 
Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890
Unisoc SC9863A

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Exynos 8 Octa 88908% SC9863A5%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Exynos 8 Octa 889054% SC9863A31%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Exynos 8 Octa 88907% SC9863A4%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Exynos 8 Octa 8890 SC9863A
Total score12335073522
CPU3453620588
GPU4687527947
MEM1974511762
UX2221213228

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Exynos 8 Octa 8890 SC9863A
Single-Core252190
Multi-Core1110856

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Exynos 8 Octa 8890 SC9863A
Frequency2300 MHz1600 MHz
Cores88
Bit6464
Lithography14 nm28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration4x2.3 GHz Exynos Mongoose
4x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
4x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
4x1.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)5 W5 W
Memory typeLPDDR4LPDDR3
Max. Memory4 Gb4 Gb
Memory Frequency1866933
Memory bandwidth26.8224
Neural Processor (NPU)NoNo
L1 cache384 KB256 KB
L2 cache2 MB512 KB
L3 cache8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 8 Octa 8890 is 30% better than SC9863A in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-T880 MP12IMG8322
GPU Frequency650 MHz510 MHz
GFloPS265146.2
# of Cores12128
# of Shader Units
Display4096 x 2160 pixels2160 x 1080 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile24.9
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)47.515.9
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra50.426.9
Call of Duty: Mobile26.317.3
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)43.512.4
Minecraft: Pocket Edition61.716.2
Real Racing 375.640.4
Sniper 3D80.643
Need for Speed No Limits80.637.7
Mortal Kombat X5843
CSR Racing 270.632.3
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution24 MP16 MP
Dual Camera resolution24 MP16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS6030
Video Encoding resolution4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHDFullHD
Codec supportH.264, H.265/HEVC, VP9H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC


Networks and Navigation
ModemLTE Cat.12/13 2/3 CALTE-4
Download speed600 MBit/s.150 MBit/s.
Upload speed150 MBit/s.50 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Glonass, BeidouGPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportNoNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 is better: 34
The number of parameters for which Unisoc SC9863A is better: 3
   You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets Exynos 8 Octa 8890 and SC9863A, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Exynos 8 Octa 8890 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
SC9863A SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile


Exynos 8 Octa 8890 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Helio P65 (MT6768)
• Vs Kirin 659
• Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884
• Vs Tiger T310
• Vs Exynos 7 7904
• Vs Kirin 955
• Vs Helio G25
• Vs Snapdragon 630
• Vs Kirin 950
• Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus
• Vs Exynos 850
• Vs Helio P40
• Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
• Vs Kirin 710F
• Vs Snapdragon 636
• Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
• Vs MediaTek Helio A25
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
• Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9609
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro
• Vs MediaTek Helio P70
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9611
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9610
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
• Vs MediaTek Helio P60
• Vs MediaTek Helio P90
• Vs MediaTek Helio P95
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
• Vs MediaTek Helio G70
• Vs Samsung Exynos 880
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G35
• Vs Atom x5-Z8300
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872
• Vs MediaTek MT8768T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro
• Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976
• Vs MediaTek Helio P35
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420
• Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994
• Vs MediaTek MT8176
• Vs Atom x5-Z8550
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T610
• Vs Unisoc SC79863a
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T606
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T616
• Vs MediaTek Helio G37
• Vs MediaTek MT8766
• Vs MediaTek MT8168
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500
• Vs MediaTek MT8788
• Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS4290


SC9863A SoC Comparisons
• Vs Kirin 659
• Vs Snapdragon 425 MSM8917
• Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884
• Vs Tiger T310
• Vs Exynos 7 7904
• Vs Kirin 955
• Vs Helio G25
• Vs Snapdragon 630
• Vs Kirin 950
• Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus
• Vs Exynos 850
• Vs Helio P40
• Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
• Vs Kirin 710F
• Vs Snapdragon 636
• Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
• Vs MediaTek Helio A25
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
• Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T)
• Vs Atom x5-Z8350
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T)
• Vs MediaTek Helio G35
• Vs Qualcomm 215
• Vs MediaTek MT6750T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872
• Vs MediaTek MT8768T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro
• Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976
• Vs MediaTek Helio P35
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420
• Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994
• Vs MediaTek MT8176
• Vs Atom x5-Z8550
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22
• Vs Atom x5-Z8500
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B
• Vs Atom x7-Z8700
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1
• Vs MediaTek MT6595M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430
• Vs MediaTek Helio P18
• Vs Unisoc SC9853I
• Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935
• Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro)
• Vs MediaTek Helio A22
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805
• Vs Allwinner A133
• Vs Unisoc SC79863a
• Vs MediaTek MT8766
• Vs Rockchip RK3566
• Vs MediaTek MT8168
• Vs MediaTek MT8788
• Vs Rockchip RK3326S
• Vs Qualcomm QCM2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS8250
• Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS6490
• Vs MediaTek Helio G36
• Vs Unisoc SC9863A1
• Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands