MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive data of speed tests and benchmarks MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890, compare of GPUs Mali-T880 MP12 and Mali-T880 MP2.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: Helio P25 (MT6757T) is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Exynos 8 Octa 8890 is octa-core (Exynos Mongoose). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful analysis of all the specifications of the SoCs, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special test applications such as Mozilla Kraken, Octane V2, 3DMark, PCMark, Neocore, GeekBench 6, 5, Vellamo, WebXPRT 3, PassMark, GFXBench, AnTuTu 8, Quadrant, and how good the SoCs are in games Call of Duty: Mobile, Sniper 3D, PUBG, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Real Racing 3, Fortnite, Minecraft Bedrock, Mortal Kombat etc.
   After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which chipset is better to buy Helio P25 (MT6757T) or Exynos 8 Octa 8890 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, CSR Racing 2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Helio P25 (MT6757T)

Exynos 8 Octa 8890

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Helio P25 (MT6757T)

49%

Exynos 8 Octa 8890

54%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Helio P25 (MT6757T)

Exynos 8 Octa 8890

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Helio P25 (MT6757T)	Exynos 8 Octa 8890
Total score	63651	123350
CPU	17812	34536
GPU	24191	46875
MEM	10184	19745
UX	11466	22212

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Helio P25 (MT6757T)	Exynos 8 Octa 8890
Single-Core	164	252
Multi-Core	741	1110

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Helio P25 (MT6757T)	Exynos 8 Octa 8890
Frequency	2600 MHz	2300 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	16 nm	14 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x2.3 GHz Exynos Mongoose 4x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	5 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR3, LPDDR4x	LPDDR4
Max. Memory	LPDDR4(X) до 6GB, LPDDR3 до 4GB	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	2x LPDDR4(X) 1600MHz, 1x LPDDR3 933MHz	1866
Memory bandwidth	14	26.82
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	384 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	2 MB
L3 cache	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Helio P25 (MT6757T) is 11% better than Exynos 8 Octa 8890 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-T880 MP2	Mali-T880 MP12
GPU Frequency	1000 MHz	650 MHz
GFloPS	68	265
# of Cores	2	12
# of Shader Units
Display	1920 x 1080 pixels	4096 x 2160 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile		24.9
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	12.5	47.5
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	22.1	50.4
Call of Duty: Mobile	14.5	26.3
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	10.3	43.5
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	13.5	61.7
Real Racing 3	27.6	75.6
Sniper 3D	48.6	80.6
Need for Speed No Limits	30.9	80.6
Mortal Kombat X	25.4	58
CSR Racing 2	24.3	70.6

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	24 MP	24 MP
Dual Camera resolution	13 MP	24 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	60
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP9

Networks and Navigation

Modem		LTE Cat.12/13 2/3 CA
Download speed	300 MBit/s.	600 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 is better: 31
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors think, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Helio P25 (MT6757T) SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10

• Helio P25 (MT6757T) specs and review.

Exynos 8 Octa 8890 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10

• Exynos 8 Octa 8890 specs and review.