Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 benchmark which processor is better

Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which processor or chip is better? Full comparison data of benchmarks Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, speed testing of GPUs Mali-T880 MP12 and Adreno 610.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: Exynos 8 Octa 8890 is octa-core (Exynos Mongoose) and Snapdragon 665 is octa-core (Kryo 260). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the processors, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests like WebXPRT 3, Mozilla Kraken, GFXBench, PCMark, Quadrant, GeekBench 6, 5, Vellamo, AnTuTu 8, Neocore, PassMark, 3DMark, Octane V2, and how good the processors are in games Call of Duty: Mobile, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Mortal Kombat, Sniper 3D, Fortnite, PUBG, Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock etc.
   After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processors is better to buy Exynos 8 Octa 8890 or Snapdragon 665 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Asphalt 9.

 
Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Exynos 8 Octa 88908% Snapdragon 66511%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Exynos 8 Octa 889054% Snapdragon 66566%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Exynos 8 Octa 88907% Snapdragon 6658%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Exynos 8 Octa 8890 Snapdragon 665
Total score123350153366
CPU3453642942
GPU4687558273
MEM1974524532
UX2221227605

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Exynos 8 Octa 8890 Snapdragon 665
Single-Core252314
Multi-Core11101320

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Exynos 8 Octa 8890 Snapdragon 665
Frequency2300 MHz2000 MHz
Cores88
Bit6464
Lithography14 nm11 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration4x2.3 GHz Exynos Mongoose
4x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
8x2.0 GHz Kryo 260
Power consumption (TDP)5 W5 W
Memory typeLPDDR4LPDDR4x (Dual Channel)
Max. Memory4 Gb8 Gb
Memory Frequency18661866
Memory bandwidth26.8214.9
Neural Processor (NPU)NoNo
L1 cache384 KB
L2 cache2 MB
L3 cache
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 8 Octa 8890 is 13% better than Snapdragon 665 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-T880 MP12Adreno 610
GPU Frequency650 MHz750 MHz
GFloPS265312
# of Cores12
# of Shader Units192
Display4096 x 2160 pixels2520 x 1080 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile24.929.9
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)47.528.2
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra50.455.5
Call of Duty: Mobile26.330.8
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)43.523.9
Minecraft: Pocket Edition61.739.6
Real Racing 375.683.3
Sniper 3D80.6122.1
Need for Speed No Limits80.699.9
Mortal Kombat X5888.8
CSR Racing 270.666.6
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution24 MP24 MP
Dual Camera resolution24 MP16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)Qualcomm Spectra 165
Video Encoding FPS6030
Video Encoding resolution4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec supportH.264, H.265/HEVC, VP9H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC


Networks and Navigation
ModemLTE Cat.12/13 2/3 CAQualcomm Snapdragon X12 LTE modem
Download speed600 MBit/s.600 MBit/s.
Upload speed150 MBit/s.150 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Glonass, BeidouGLONASS, GPS, Galileo, SBAS, QZSS, Beidou
NFC supportNoNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 is better: 14
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 is better: 20
   Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips Exynos 8 Octa 8890 and Snapdragon 665, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Exynos 8 Octa 8890 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
Snapdragon 665 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10


Exynos 8 Octa 8890 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Helio P65 (MT6768)
• Vs Kirin 659
• Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884
• Vs Tiger T310
• Vs Exynos 7 7904
• Vs Kirin 955
• Vs Helio G25
• Vs Snapdragon 630
• Vs Kirin 950
• Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus
• Vs Exynos 850
• Vs Helio P40
• Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
• Vs Kirin 710F
• Vs Snapdragon 636
• Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
• Vs MediaTek Helio A25
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
• Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9609
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro
• Vs MediaTek Helio P70
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9611
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9610
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
• Vs MediaTek Helio P60
• Vs MediaTek Helio P90
• Vs MediaTek Helio P95
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
• Vs MediaTek Helio G70
• Vs Samsung Exynos 880
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G35
• Vs Unisoc SC9863A
• Vs Atom x5-Z8300
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872
• Vs MediaTek MT8768T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro
• Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976
• Vs MediaTek Helio P35
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420
• Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994
• Vs MediaTek MT8176
• Vs Atom x5-Z8550
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T610
• Vs Unisoc SC79863a
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T606
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T616
• Vs MediaTek Helio G37
• Vs MediaTek MT8766
• Vs MediaTek MT8168
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500
• Vs MediaTek MT8788
• Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS4290


Snapdragon 665 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Helio P65 (MT6768)
• Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884
• Vs Tiger T310
• Vs Exynos 7 7904
• Vs Kirin 955
• Vs Helio G25
• Vs Kirin 950
• Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus
• Vs Exynos 850
• Vs Helio P40
• Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
• Vs Kirin 710F
• Vs Snapdragon 636
• Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X)
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T710
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
• Vs MediaTek Helio A25
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
• Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G35
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872
• Vs MediaTek MT8768T
• Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T610
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
• Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T606
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T616
• Vs MediaTek Helio G37
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T612
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500
• Vs Qualcomm QCM2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850
• Vs MediaTek Helio G36
• Vs Allwinner A523
• Vs Rockchip RK3562
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands